Information Broker Consensus Detection System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional social networking and prediction markets are inadequate for determining quality information from noise and do not provide sufficient incentives for users to contribute valuable insights, nor do they allow users to define the issues being voted on, limiting their ability to detect consensus early and advance original ideas.

Innovation Solution

A distributed system that allows users to submit and vote on original observations and opinions, providing incentives for quality contributions and allowing users to define the issues, with mechanisms for monitoring voting trends and adjusting the value of contributions based on consensus strength and user expertise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional social networking and prediction markets are used, then users can share ideas and compete, but the system cannot distinguish quality information from noise and lacks sufficient incentives for valuable contributions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality information detectionVSAvoidsignal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where users receive notifications and updates based on voting patterns and consensus development. The information broker provides feedback to users about their contributions' impact and facilitates continuous interaction based on evolving consensus, allowing quality information to be distinguished through iterative validation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

An information broker acts as an intermediary between users, managing the complexity of consensus detection and information quality assessment. The broker synthesizes voting data, identifies consensus patterns, and presents refined information to users, filtering noise from valuable contributions through centralized analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional prediction markets are used, then users can vote on predefined issues, but users cannot define the issues being voted on, limiting original idea advancement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveissue definition flexibilityVSAvoidsystem management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Users independently define issues, observations, and predictions without requiring system administrator intervention. The system provides self-service capabilities where users can create their own voting topics, set parameters, and manage their contributions, enabling original idea advancement while maintaining system functionality through user autonomy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides universal functionality that handles both user-defined issues and traditional prediction market scenarios. The information broker and voting mechanisms are designed to accommodate multiple types of contributions (observations, predictions, opinions) and issue definitions, making the system versatile without requiring separate management systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Speed

If conventional systems are used, then basic voting can occur, but early consensus detection is limited and decision-making is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsensus detection speedVSAvoiddecision-making time
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of voting patterns and consensus development in real-time as votes are cast. The information broker continuously monitors voting data and prepares consensus assessments ahead of formal decision points, enabling faster detection of emerging consensus and reducing overall decision-making time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual consensus analysis with automated information broker algorithms that continuously process voting data. This substitution of mechanical human analysis with automated computational analysis enables real-time consensus detection and significantly speeds up the identification of emerging agreements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If conventional prediction markets are used, then trading can occur on established events, but the system lacks mechanisms to incentivize and reward valuable user contributions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser contribution valueVSAvoiduser incentive motivation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where users receive recognition and potential rewards based on the value and accuracy of their contributions. The information broker tracks contribution impact, and the system provides feedback to users about their standing, motivating continued valuable participation through visible recognition and incentive mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10510087B2Method and apparatus for conducting an information brokering service
Publication Date: 2019.12.17 SERMO
  • US10510087B2 patent drawing
  • US10510087B2 patent drawing
  • US10510087B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method is provided that provides an early indication of consensus of opinion among a number of users regarding an event or observation indicated by a user. The opinion can be interesting to an information consumer, for determining the outcome of the consensus relating to the event or observation, or for performing surveillance or survey of a particular issue or subject. Such recognition of early events or observations can be useful in different areas, such as healthcare, finance, etc., where initial observations, if provided early, allow resulting decisions to be made much earlier. The opinion can, for instance, be used as an early indicator of problem with a product, company, etc. that would permit an information consumer to perform an action at a much earlier point than if he/she relied on traditional sources of information. Thus, such opinion information can be invaluable as a tool for monitoring events.