Information Security Program Maturity Platform With Peer Benchmarking
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Cybersecurity organizations face challenges with inconsistent operations, lack of visibility, and ineffective communication due to the immaturity of the Cybersecurity industry, shortage of skilled resources, and subjective risk quantification, leading to difficulties in understanding program maturity, financial exposure, and relative posture against peers.
Innovation Solution
A computer-based system that provides real-time dynamic metrics and market comparisons, allowing authenticated users to conduct security assessments, rank investment projects, simulate impact, and offer virtual CISO services, while encrypting data at rest and in motion, to address executive-level communication and skills shortages.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If manual security assessments are conducted by third-party assessors, then organizational security posture can be evaluated, but the assessments become point-in-time events that quickly lose significance and require significant time, effort and resources
Solution Approach 1:
The system enables organizations to conduct self-assessments using automated digital questionnaires and benchmarks, eliminating the need for external assessors. Organizations can continuously evaluate their own security posture without requiring external expertise, reducing both time consumption and resource requirements while maintaining assessment accuracy through standardized frameworks.
Solution Approach 2:
The system transforms discrete point-in-time assessments into continuous monitoring and evaluation processes. Organizations can continuously update their security posture measurements and compare them against benchmarks, ensuring the information remains current and significant rather than becoming obsolete quickly.
2Ease of operation
If Project Impact Analysis is conducted manually with sponsor bias, then project prioritization can be performed, but the analysis does not take into consideration all organizational stakeholders and has limited financial analysis
Solution Approach 1:
The system creates a universal platform that collects input from multiple stakeholder groups simultaneously, consolidating diverse perspectives into a unified project prioritization analysis. The multi-functional system handles both qualitative stakeholder feedback and quantitative financial analysis in an integrated manner, eliminating the limitations of manual single-perspective assessments.
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements feedback loops where stakeholder inputs and financial data are continuously collected, analyzed, and used to refine project prioritization recommendations. This iterative feedback process ensures all organizational perspectives are considered and allows for refined financial analysis that accounts for multiple stakeholder requirements.
3Adaptability or versatility
If organizational risk is treated as having subjective elements, then qualitative attributes like reputational damage can be acknowledged, but a quantified value cannot be derived for financial exposure
Solution Approach 1:
The system transforms qualitative risk parameters into quantitative measurements by applying standardized frameworks and benchmarks. Qualitative attributes such as reputational damage are converted into measurable financial exposure values through systematic parameter transformation, enabling both qualitative recognition and quantitative analysis of organizational risks.
4Reliability
If skilled executive level Cybersecurity resources are hired, then effective ISMS management can be achieved, but the high salaries create underserved organizations that cannot afford ideal candidates
Solution Approach 1:
The system empowers organizations to manage their own ISMS effectively through automated tools, digital questionnaires, and embedded expertise. Organizations no longer need to hire expensive executive-level cybersecurity resources to achieve effective management, as the system provides self-service capabilities that deliver professional-grade security management at a fraction of the cost.
Solution Approach 2:
The system replicates the expertise of experienced cybersecurity executives through standardized frameworks, benchmarks, and automated analysis tools. Instead of requiring actual executive personnel, the system copies and codifies their knowledge and methodologies into accessible digital tools that any organization can utilize regardless of resource constraints.
Data Source
AI summary
Disclosed is a method of more effectively managing and displaying an Information Security Management System (ISMS), or Cybersecurity Framework, by an application executing on a computer device for computing and displaying real time dynamic metrics and market comparison for the User. The method includes authenticated and authorized Users to conduct security baselines based on industry accepted standards in order to establish a plurality of metric baselines dynamically and in real time. The method further includes projects submitted to be measured against organizational goals and simulate the impact to the Security baselines. The method further includes the ability to provide financial visibility into the financial exposure of a Security Breach, or Data exfiltration and other available financial metrics. The method further includes a platform by which companies may request Virtual CISO's services from a pool of executive level resources.