Multi-Threshold Infrared Sensor Alarm Triggering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing infrared motion sensors face false alarms due to varying infrared radiation magnitudes from different objects and ambient conditions, as they rely on a single fixed threshold for detection.

Innovation Solution

Implementing multiple thresholds, including a first determination threshold, a second determination threshold greater than the first, and a time determination threshold, to determine whether a sensor signal satisfies alarm conditions, thereby reducing false alarms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single fixed threshold is used for detection, then the device complexity is low, but false alarms increase due to varying infrared radiation magnitudes from different objects and ambient conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidthreshold structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The single fixed threshold is segmented into multiple thresholds (first determination threshold, second determination threshold, third determination threshold) with different sensitivity levels. Each threshold serves a specific detection purpose, allowing the system to distinguish between different types of targets and reduce false alarms while maintaining manageable complexity through structured segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The threshold parameter is changed from a single fixed value to multiple variable values with different magnitudes. The system dynamically selects and adjusts threshold parameters based on detection needs, transforming the static threshold into a flexible multi-level parameter system that adapts to different detection scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple thresholds are used for detection, then false alarms are reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm accuracyVSAvoiddetermination logic
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The determination logic is made dynamic through time-based adaptation. The system transitions from static threshold comparison to dynamic multi-stage determination that evolves over time. The first determination threshold is used initially, and based on time duration and signal persistence, the system dynamically progresses to second and third thresholds, creating an adaptive detection flow that reduces false alarms while managing complexity through temporal dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary determination using the first determination threshold before proceeding to more complex evaluations. This preliminary action filters out obvious false alarms early in the process, allowing the system to reserve more complex determination logic for cases that truly require it, thereby managing overall system complexity while maintaining high alarm accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If a single determination approach is used, then the processing speed is fast, but the detection precision decreases due to inability to distinguish different target types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget identification accuracyVSAvoiddetermination speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The single determination approach is segmented into multiple determination stages (first determination, second determination, third determination) with increasing precision. Each stage handles specific aspects of target identification, allowing the system to achieve high measurement precision through structured segmentation while maintaining processing speed by filtering candidates through progressive stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial determination actions at each stage rather than performing complete analysis on all signals. The first determination threshold performs a quick partial check, and only signals that pass this partial action proceed to more thorough determination stages, thereby maintaining overall processing speed while achieving high precision for confirmed targets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces false alarms by adjusting sensitivity based on signal magnitude and duration, ensuring more precise detection of alarm states.

Implementation Method 1

a passive infrared sensor (PIR) that absorbs an infrared radiation signal from an external object through a Fresnel lens on the surface of the sensor itself and generates an analog signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfrared radiation absorption: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

absorbs an infrared radiation signal from an external object through a Fresnel lens on the surface of the sensor itself

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFresnel lens focusing: Fresnel Lens

Data Source

PatentUS10121363B2Alarm triggering method for sensor and electronic device using the same
Publication Date: 2018.11.06 LITE ON ELECTRONICS (GUANGZHOU) LTD
  • US10121363B2 patent drawing
  • US10121363B2 patent drawing
  • US10121363B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An alarm triggering method for a sensor and an electronic device using the same are proposed. The method is applicable to an electronic device and includes the following steps. A sensor signal is received from the sensor. Whether a signal magnitude of the sensor signal satisfies a first triggering condition associated with a first determination threshold is determined. In response to the signal magnitude satisfying the first triggering condition, whether the signal magnitude satisfies a second triggering condition associated with a second determination threshold or a third triggering condition associated with a time determination threshold is further determined, where the second determination threshold is greater than the first determination threshold. When the signal magnitude satisfies the second triggering condition or the third triggering condition, the sensor is determined to be in an alarm state so as to output an alarm signal.