Infrastructure Failure Predictor Using Historical Relationship Indexing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional risk assessment for technology infrastructure changes focuses on data related to the change itself rather than historical relationships between physical devices, applications, and individuals involved, leading to inadequate prediction of failure risks.

Innovation Solution

A predictive modeling apparatus and method that uses machine-readable memory and processors to create an index for infrastructure changes based on historical data, including infrastructure change identifiers, device identifiers, and application identifiers, to predict failure rates by analyzing relationships and correlations between change elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional risk assessment focuses on data surrounding the infrastructure change itself, then the assessment process is simple and straightforward, but the prediction accuracy of failure risk is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidassessment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the risk assessment into multiple dimensions: change characteristics, historical relationships between physical devices, applications, and individuals, and contextual factors. This segmentation allows comprehensive analysis without overwhelming complexity by organizing data into manageable categories that can be processed systematically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from traditional one-dimensional assessment (change data only) to multi-dimensional assessment by incorporating historical relationships across different entities (devices, applications, individuals). This dimensional expansion enables more accurate failure risk prediction by considering interactions across multiple axes of the infrastructure ecosystem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If historical relationships between physical devices, applications and individuals are analyzed, then failure risk prediction improves, but the data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure risk predictionVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and organizing historical relationship data before actual risk assessment. This includes establishing baseline relationships between devices, applications, and individuals, and pre-calculating interaction patterns. These preliminary structures enable faster, more efficient risk prediction when actual changes occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary data structures that mediate between raw historical data and risk prediction outputs. These intermediaries include relationship graphs, interaction matrices, and contextual profiles that simplify complex historical relationships into manageable formats for analysis, reducing processing complexity while maintaining prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8230268B2Technology infrastructure failure predictor
Publication Date: 2012.07.24 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US8230268B2 patent drawing
  • US8230268B2 patent drawing
  • US8230268B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods for reducing infrastructure failure rates. The apparatus and methods may compile and store data related to the physical devices and applications associated with an infrastructure change. Variables may be derived from the stored data using a range of methods and multiple variable values may be consolidated. A model may be developed based on the values and relationships of the derived variables. The model may be applied to assess the risk of a prospective infrastructure change.