Infrastructure-Guided Vehicle Path Coordination for Lane-Reduced Traffic
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
In situations with changing traffic conditions, it is challenging for autonomous vehicles to agree on local path plans through N: N driving negotiation within a given time, especially in environments with reduced lanes due to city intersections or unexpected situations.
Innovation Solution
A cooperative maneuvering method based on infrastructure guidance, where a roadside unit (RSU) receives planned paths from autonomous vehicles, determines an infrastructure guidance path based on traffic situation and law information, and transmits this path back to the vehicles for navigation.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If N: N driving negotiation is performed between autonomous vehicles to agree on local path plans, then collision avoidance capability is improved, but negotiation time and system complexity increase significantly in environments with reduced lanes
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces an infrastructure entity (roadside unit or central controller) as an intermediary to facilitate path plan negotiation. Instead of direct N: N vehicle-to-vehicle negotiation, the infrastructure receives planned paths from multiple vehicles, determines coordinated paths considering traffic situations and laws, and transmits agreed paths back to vehicles. This mediator approach significantly reduces negotiation time while maintaining collision avoidance capability.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent segments the negotiation process into distinct phases: vehicle-to-infrastructure path submission, infrastructure path coordination and determination, and infrastructure-to-vehicle path transmission. This segmentation allows parallel processing of multiple vehicle paths by the infrastructure, reducing overall negotiation time compared to sequential vehicle-to-vehicle negotiation.
2Reliability
If N: N driving negotiation is performed between autonomous vehicles to agree on local path plans, then collision avoidance capability is improved, but device complexity and computational burden increase
Solution Approach 1:
The infrastructure entity serves as a centralized coordinator that manages path negotiation complexity. Instead of each vehicle needing to communicate and coordinate with all other N-1 vehicles (creating O(N²) communication complexity), vehicles only need to communicate with the infrastructure (O(N) complexity). The infrastructure handles the complex coordination logic, path conflict detection, and agreement formulation.
Solution Approach 2:
Vehicles independently generate their initial planned paths using their own path planning algorithms without requiring complex inter-vehicle coordination. Each vehicle submits its self-generated plan to the infrastructure, which then performs the coordinated adjustment. This self-service approach reduces the computational burden on individual vehicles while maintaining overall system coordination.
3Productivity
If infrastructure guidance path is determined based on traffic situation and law information, then path coordination efficiency is improved, but information processing requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The infrastructure pre-stores traffic situation data (such as intersection geometry, lane configurations, signal timing) and traffic law rules (right-of-way priorities, prohibited maneuvers) in databases before negotiation occurs. This preliminary preparation allows the infrastructure to quickly evaluate vehicle path requests against pre-defined criteria without processing raw traffic data in real-time, reducing information processing load during active negotiation.
Data Source
AI summary
A cooperative maneuvering method based on infrastructure guidance including receiving a first message including a planned path from each of at least one vehicle, determining an infrastructure guidance path for the at least one vehicle based on the planned path, and transmitting a second message including the infrastructure guidance path to the at least one vehicle.


