Infrastructure Sensor System for Collision-Free Region Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for guiding motor vehicles in a semiautomated manner within infrastructure do not efficiently communicate the availability of collision-free regions, leading to potential collisions.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses regional signals from a surround-sensor system to determine if a region is free of collision objects at an expected arrival time, and communicates this information to the vehicle via a communications network.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the motor vehicle continuously monitors the infrastructure region using surround-sensor system, then the collision detection capability is improved, but the system complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary monitoring of the infrastructure region before the motor vehicle arrives. The surround-sensor system continuously scans the region in advance, and the evaluation unit pre-determines whether collision objects are present at the expected arrival time, rather than waiting for the vehicle to reach the region and then conducting real-time detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop where the evaluation unit continuously receives regional signals from the surround-sensor system, processes this information to determine collision-free status, and provides feedback to the motor vehicle control unit. This feedback mechanism enables the vehicle to receive timely information about the safety status of the region without requiring continuous complex processing during the actual approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the motor vehicle receives real-time information about collision-free regions, then the trip efficiency and safety are improved, but the information transmission delay and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrip efficiencyVSAvoidinformation transmission delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation unit determines the collision-free status of the region in advance, before the motor vehicle reaches the region. By performing this evaluation beforehand and storing the result, the system eliminates the need for real-time processing and transmission decisions at the critical moment, thereby reducing information transmission delay and improving trip efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a copy of the regional safety status information and transmits it to the motor vehicle. Instead of requiring continuous real-time data exchange, the system evaluates the region once in advance, stores this information, and provides it to the vehicle when needed, effectively copying the essential safety determination rather than maintaining a live connection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If the surround-sensor system continuously monitors the infrastructure, then the collision detection accuracy is improved, but the energy consumption and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs the energy-intensive monitoring and evaluation actions in advance, before the motor vehicle reaches the region. The surround-sensor system continuously scans the region beforehand, and the evaluation unit processes this information to determine collision-free status prior to the vehicle's arrival, thereby concentrating energy consumption during the pre-evaluation phase rather than continuously during the entire approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of requiring continuous real-time monitoring and processing throughout the vehicle's approach, the system employs periodic action by evaluating the region at specific intervals or in advance periods. The surround-sensor system performs monitoring cycles before the vehicle arrives, and the evaluation unit processes information periodically to determine safety status, thereby reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12315373B2Method for assisting a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.05.27 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US12315373B2 patent drawing
  • US12315373B2 patent drawing
  • US12315373B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for assisting a motor vehicle during a trip of the motor vehicle within an infrastructure, the trip of the motor vehicle being guided in an at least semiautomated manner. The method includes: receiving regional signals, which represent a first region of the infrastructure monitored using a surround-sensor system; for the motor vehicle approaching the first region, determining if a second region is free of a possible collision object for the motor vehicle at an expected arrival time of the motor vehicle at the first or second region, based on the regional signals; if the second region is free of a possible collision object for the motor vehicle at the expected arrival time, outputting a release signal for transmitting to the motor vehicle a communications message, that the second region is free of a possible collision object at the expected arrival time.