Infrastructure Threat Change Analysis Using Automated Threat Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increased speed of infrastructure changes in cloud environments leads to manual security threat reviews becoming a bottleneck, causing delays and potential risks of missing security threats due to the complexity of modern infrastructure environments.

Innovation Solution

A system that automatically generates and compares threat models for current and proposed infrastructure states, identifying security changes and determining appropriate actions to ensure timely and reliable threat analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual security threat review is used, then security analysis can be performed, but the speed of change implementation is limited and delays occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity threat analysis reliabilityVSAvoidchange implementation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual security threat review processes with an automated system that uses threat models to automatically assess security impacts of infrastructure changes. The system automatically generates threat models, compares them against baseline threat models, and determines security implications without requiring manual analysis, thereby eliminating the bottleneck between security review and change implementation speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of security review approach from manual to automated by introducing threat models as a measurable parameter. The system quantifies security impacts by comparing threat model parameters (such as threat likelihood, vulnerability exposure, and security control effectiveness) before and after proposed changes, enabling rapid automated assessment that scales with infrastructure complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If manual security threat review is used, then security threats can be identified, but the complexity of modern infrastructure environments makes thorough analysis difficult and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity threat identification accuracyVSAvoidinfrastructure environment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the security analysis process into discrete components by creating threat models that break down infrastructure environments into manageable elements. Each threat model represents a specific infrastructure component or configuration state, allowing the system to analyze complex environments by combining results from simpler, modular threat model assessments rather than attempting to analyze the entire infrastructure at once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the infrastructure environment's security state through threat models. Instead of manually analyzing the actual complex infrastructure, the system generates a simplified digital representation (threat model) that captures security-relevant characteristics. This copy can be rapidly manipulated, compared, and analyzed to identify security impacts without exposing analysts to the full complexity of the production environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If automated threat model generation is implemented, then change implementation speed increases, but new systems must be developed and maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechange implementation speedVSAvoidautomated system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the automated threat model generation system to serve multiple functions: it generates threat models for infrastructure changes, compares threat models against baseline versions, identifies security impacts, and provides recommendations. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate systems into a single unified platform, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the automated system learns from actual security incidents and infrastructure configurations to improve its threat model generation. The system incorporates feedback from security teams about false positives and missed threats, continuously refining its algorithms. This feedback loop reduces the complexity burden by automatically adapting to changing infrastructure patterns without requiring manual reconfiguration of the automated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12386974B2Threat change analysis system
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US12386974B2 patent drawing
  • US12386974B2 patent drawing
  • US12386974B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for analyzing security threat changes of proposed changes to an infrastructure environment. For example, system and approaches for determining actions to be performed based on security threat changes corresponding to proposed changes to the infrastructure environment is disclosed.