Infusion Device Active Passive Check Valves Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Implantable infusion devices face challenges in precise substance delivery due to exposure to ambient pressure, which can lead to elevated reservoir pressure, excess infusion, and potential component damage, as well as inefficiencies in energy usage and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a bolus pump system with a passive check valve and an active check valve in series, where the passive check valve opens in response to fluid pressure and the active check valve is actuated to control fluid flow, reducing flow resistance and preventing excess infusion by maintaining the active check valve closed unless activated.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a passive check valve is used to prevent backflow, then reliability is improved, but flow resistance increases and energy efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackflow preventionVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a dynamically actuated check valve that can switch between passive and active states. The valve transitions from a static passive check valve to a dynamic system where the valve opening is controlled based on flow conditions, allowing optimization of both backflow prevention and flow resistance reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The valve is preliminarily positioned in an open state before backflow occurs, allowing normal forward flow to pass with minimal resistance. When backflow is detected or anticipated, the valve actively closes to prevent reverse flow, combining the benefits of open-flow efficiency with backflow protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the active check valve is kept closed to prevent excess infusion, then safety is improved, but flow resistance increases and delivery accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddelivery accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs feedback control where the active check valve's state is continuously adjusted based on real-time monitoring of reservoir pressure and flow conditions. This feedback mechanism ensures the valve remains closed only when necessary to prevent excess infusion, while staying open during normal operation to maintain precise delivery accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The active check valve transitions from a static closed position to a dynamically controlled state, opening and closing based on real-time system conditions. This dynamic control allows the valve to maintain safety by preventing excess infusion while preserving delivery accuracy during therapeutic substance administration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If the reservoir is exposed to ambient pressure for ease of refilling, then ease of operation is improved, but reservoir pressure stability deteriorates leading to excess infusion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefilling easeVSAvoidreservoir pressure stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The active check valve serves as an intermediary between the reservoir and the external environment. It allows controlled interaction with ambient pressure during refilling operations while preventing harmful pressure fluctuations from affecting the reservoir, thus maintaining pressure stability without compromising ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary protective action by having the active check valve close in anticipation of harmful pressure changes before they can affect the reservoir. This prevents external pressure fluctuations from causing excess infusion while still allowing controlled refilling operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances energy efficiency and safety by reducing flow resistance and minimizing excess substance infusion, while ensuring precise and controlled delivery of therapeutic substances, even under varying pressure conditions.

Implementation Method 1

The passive check valve opens in response to fluid pressure of the therapeutic substance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

If the active check valve is in the form of a solenoid check valve, one or more coils may be energized to open the check valve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolenoid electromagnetic actuation: Solenoid

Data Source

PatentUS8323267B2Infusion device with active and passive check valves
Publication Date: 2012.12.04 MEDTRONIC INC
  • US8323267B2 patent drawing
  • US8323267B2 patent drawing
  • US8323267B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An infusion system in which therapeutic substance from a reservoir is pumped by a bolus pump to an infusion port is disclosed. The therapeutic substance delivered by the bolus pump passes first through a passive check valve located downstream from the pump. The passive check valve opens in response to fluid pressure of the therapeutic substance. After passing through the passive check valve, the therapeutic substance passes through an active check valve located downstream from the passive check if the active check valve is actuated such that it is open. When not activated, the active check valve is closed and fluid flow through the active check valve in the downstream direction is prevented.