Electronic Inhaler Menu Control Using Pressure Sensor Input

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic inhalation devices lack user-friendly customization options and safety features for altering operational parameters and settings.

Innovation Solution

An electronic inhalation device equipped with a computer processor, pressure sensor, and audio signaling means, allowing users to enter a menu mode via distinct actions like blowing or sucking, enabling configuration of operational parameters and suspension of vaporization during menu mode.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a menu mode is added to allow user configuration, then user customization capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser customization capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The existing pressure sensor, originally designed solely to detect inhalation for vaporizer activation, is enhanced to serve dual purposes: it continues to detect normal inhalation events while also functioning as an input device for menu mode navigation. By detecting specific inhalation patterns (such as prolonged inhalation or multiple sequential inhalations), the sensor enables users to enter menu mode, navigate options, and configure device parameters without requiring additional buttons or input mechanisms. This multi-functional use of the pressure sensor adds user customization capability while avoiding the complexity increase that would result from adding separate input hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If the pressure sensor is used as an input device for menu mode, then the number of components is reduced, but the reliability of normal vaporization activation may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of componentsVSAvoidvaporization activation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Different functional responses are assigned to different characteristics of the same input signal from the pressure sensor. Normal inhalation patterns (typical duration and intensity) trigger vaporizer activation, while specific distinct patterns (such as prolonged inhalation exceeding a threshold duration, or multiple rapid sequential inhalations) trigger menu mode entry. The computer analyzes the temporal and intensity characteristics of each pressure sensor signal to determine the user's intent, ensuring that normal vaporization operations remain reliable while enabling menu access through deliberately different inhalation behaviors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its interpretation of pressure sensor signals based on the current operational state. When in normal operation mode, the pressure sensor triggers vaporization. When specific patterns are detected, the system transitions to menu mode where subsequent pressure sensor inputs are interpreted as menu navigation commands rather than vaporization requests. This dynamic state-dependent interpretation ensures reliable distinction between normal use and menu interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the vaporizer is suspended during menu mode, then safety is improved by preventing unintended activation, but the duration of device unavailability for primary function increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunintended vaporizer activationVSAvoiddevice unavailability time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The menu mode incorporates automatic timeout functionality that periodically checks for user inactivity. If no menu navigation inputs are detected within a predetermined time period, the system automatically exits menu mode and returns to normal vaporization operation. This ensures that even if a user inadvertently enters menu mode or forgets to exit it, the device will resume its primary function after a brief interval, thereby minimizing the loss of time while maintaining safety during active menu configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances user control and safety by allowing customizable settings and preventing unintended vaporizer activation, providing a more tailored and secure user experience.

Implementation Method 1

the computer is configured in use to enter the menu mode when the pressure sensor detects operation of the device outside of normal mode use

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure detection:

Implementation Method 2

causes a heater coil to heat up and vaporise the liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 3

the atomizing unit atomizes the medium when a user puffs on the orifice such that vapour containing the deliverables is discharged through the orifice

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentEP3485747B2Electronic inhalation device
Publication Date: 2025.06.25 NICOVENTURES TRADING LTD
  • EP3485747B2 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3485747B2 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3485747B2 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

An electronic inhalation device comprising a power cell and a computer. The computer comprises a computer processor, a memory and an input-output means. The computer is configured in use to enter a menu mode when a user activates the menu mode.