Initial Control Frame Format for Wireless Coexistence Signaling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless network technologies face interference issues due to coexistence with other technologies like Bluetooth and Zigbee, which share similar frequency bands and channels, leading to unpredictable interference and a lack of mechanisms for exchanging coexistence information in initial control frames.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of an initial control frame (ICF) and initial control response (ICR) frame design that includes unavailability information, allowing for the exchange of coexistence information through buffer status reports and multi-STA block acknowledgments, with format determination based on specific fields in the frames.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If TXOP is reduced dynamically to avoid interference from co-existing technologies, then interference management is improved, but the ability to exchange coexistence information through existing ICF and ICR frames is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference from co-existing technologiesVSAvoidcoexistence information exchange
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The ICF and ICR frames are designed to serve multiple functions: they not only facilitate the reduced TXOP mechanism for interference avoidance but also carry coexistence information exchange capabilities. The frames incorporate fields that enable both TXOP management and coexistence information transmission, making them universal control frames for dual purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The ICF and ICR frames act as intermediaries that bridge the gap between TXOP reduction needs and coexistence information exchange requirements. These frames mediate the communication between devices, carrying both the control information for TXOP management and the coexistence information needed for coordinated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If new ICF and ICR frames are designed to exchange coexistence information, then coexistence information exchange is improved, but implementation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoexistence information exchangeVSAvoidimplementation change
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By designing the ICF and ICR frames to be multi-functional, the patent avoids creating separate dedicated frames for coexistence information exchange. The existing frame structures are enhanced with additional fields that can carry coexistence information, thereby reducing the need for entirely new frame types and minimizing implementation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the TXOP control function and coexistence information exchange function into the same ICF and ICR frame structures. This consolidation eliminates the need for separate frame types, reducing the overall complexity of the system while maintaining both capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Device complexity

If existing ICF and ICR frames are used without modification, then implementation complexity is reduced, but they lack the mechanism to exchange coexistence information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation changeVSAvoidcoexistence information exchange
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the parameters and structure of existing ICF and ICR frames by adding new fields and changing existing field meanings to include coexistence information capabilities. This parameter change approach allows the frames to maintain backward compatibility while gaining new functionality for coexistence information exchange.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The enhanced ICF and ICR frames are designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously - they continue to serve their original TXOP control purposes while also carrying coexistence information. This multi-functionality approach allows existing frames to adapt to new requirements without requiring complete frame redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260025652A1Initial control frame for unavailability for wireless network
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20260025652A1 patent drawing
  • US20260025652A1 patent drawing
  • US20260025652A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A station (STA) in a wireless network includes a memory and a processor coupled to the memory, the processor is to cause receiving, from an access point (AP), an initial control frame (ICF) that solicits an initial control response (ICR) frame including unavailability information, the ICF including a field indicating a format of the ICR frame and transmitting, to the AP, the ICR frame including unavailability information, the format of the ICR frame being determined based on the field indicating the format of the ICR frame in response to the ICF.