Particle Detection in Injectable Pharmaceuticals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current particle control and inspection strategies for injectable pharmaceutical compositions do not adequately consider the safety and toxicology implications of particles, potentially risking patient health due to incomplete assessment of particle size and material composition.

Innovation Solution

Methods are developed to detect and analyze particles in injectable compositions, accepting them if the largest particle's size and mass fall within specific ranges, leveraging historical data and toxicology evaluations to ensure patient safety, particularly for compositions like etanercept, darbepoetin, and pegfilgrastim, by specifying acceptable dimensions and materials for particles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current particle control and inspection strategies are used, then manufacturing processes can be simplified, but patient safety is compromised due to inadequate assessment of particle size and material composition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient safetyVSAvoidinspection strategy complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by establishing specific numerical criteria for particle size (length, width, height dimensions) and mass thresholds that differentiate acceptable from unacceptable particles. Different parameter sets are provided for various particle materials (e.g., acrylic, aluminum, glass, metal), allowing the inspection strategy to adapt particle acceptance criteria based on material properties while maintaining a structured, manageable complexity level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a reference database of acceptable particle characteristics based on historical data and toxicology evaluations. This reference copy allows the inspection strategy to compare detected particles against pre-established safety thresholds without requiring complex real-time analysis, thereby maintaining patient safety while simplifying the inspection process through standardized comparison criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If particle size and mass ranges are strictly enforced, then patient safety is improved, but manufacturing flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient safetyVSAvoidmanufacturing flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing different particle size and mass acceptance criteria for different particle materials. Rather than using a single uniform standard for all particles, the invention tailors specific dimensional and mass thresholds to the particular material properties (e.g., density, composition) of each particle type, thereby maintaining manufacturing flexibility while ensuring patient safety through material-specific standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by focusing inspection and control efforts on particles that exceed specific size and mass thresholds, rather than requiring comprehensive control of all particles. The strategy accepts particles within defined safe ranges while requiring rejection only of particles exceeding critical thresholds, thereby maintaining manufacturing flexibility while addressing the most critical safety concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If comprehensive particle analysis is performed, then patient safety is enhanced, but inspection time and resources are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient safetyVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical inspection systems with a standardized decision-making framework based on pre-established particle size and mass criteria. Instead of requiring sophisticated real-time analysis equipment, the invention uses clear, pre-defined thresholds that can be applied through simple measurement and comparison processes, thereby enhancing patient safety through comprehensive analysis while minimizing inspection time and resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing particle size and mass acceptance criteria based on historical data and toxicology evaluations before the actual inspection process. This preliminary preparation of reference standards allows for rapid, efficient inspection by simply comparing detected particles against pre-defined thresholds, thereby enhancing patient safety through comprehensive evaluation while minimizing inspection time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11576856B2Method for making injectable pharmaceutical compositions
Publication Date: 2023.02.14 AMGEN INC
  • US11576856B2 patent drawing
  • US11576856B2 patent drawing
  • US11576856B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to methods for making injectable pharmaceutical compositions wherein particles present in the compositions are detected and analyzed, and the acceptance of the compositions is determined based on chemical and physical properties as well as toxicology and patient risks associated of the particles.