Injection Device Locking Mechanism Prevents Syringe Damage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing injection devices face issues with syringe ejection force requirements exceeding the restoring force of the return spring, leading to potential syringe damage and accidental activation, especially when used with sealed hypodermic syringes, and there is a risk of unintentional ejection and needle exposure.

Innovation Solution

The integration of a locking mechanism within the drive system prevents syringe carrier movement unless actuated, ensuring synchronized movement with the drive, and a flexible locking mechanism that allows the drive to be inserted while preventing unintended ejection, combined with a cap design to manage needle shields.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the return spring is made strong enough to overcome the boot removal force, then the syringe can be retracted reliably, but the drive spring cannot do work on the syringe components during injection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesyringe retraction reliabilityVSAvoiddrive spring work capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention separates the locking function from the return spring function by introducing a dedicated locking mechanism with locking arms and locking surfaces. The return spring only needs to overcome friction and minor resistance, not the full boot removal force, while the locking mechanism handles the primary constraint of syringe movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking arms act as an intermediary mechanism between the syringe carrier and the drive assembly. They provide a mechanical interface that prevents syringe movement without requiring the return spring to generate excessive force, thereby resolving the force conflict between retraction and injection functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the syringe is allowed to move freely out of the injection device, then boot removal is easy, but accidental activation and needle exposure risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboot removal easeVSAvoidaccidental needle exposure risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism transitions from a locked state during normal operation to an unlocked state during intentional activation. The locking arms can disengage from the locking surfaces when the drive assembly moves, allowing controlled syringe movement only during the intended injection sequence, not during accidental drops or handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism proactively prevents syringe movement before accidental activation can occur. By maintaining engagement between locking arms and locking surfaces, it counteracts unintended forces that might otherwise cause the syringe to move and the needle to be exposed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Reliability

If a separate independent locking mechanism is added to prevent syringe movement, then safety improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesyringe movement controlVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is merged with the drive assembly by integrating locking arms onto the syringe carrier and locking surfaces onto the drive components. This combination eliminates the need for a completely separate locking system, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining safety functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The drive assembly serves multiple functions: it provides the driving force for injection, controls the timing of syringe movement, and incorporates the locking mechanism to prevent accidental activation. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution prevents syringe damage, maintains sterility, and reduces the risk of accidental activation, ensuring controlled and safe operation of the injection device.

Implementation Method 1

These devices employ a drive spring and some form of release mechanism that releases the syringe from the influence of the drive spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

to allow it to be retracted by a return spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 3

The locking mechanism comprises at least one arm fixed relative the syringe carrier, wherein the arm is engageable with a corresponding locking surface on the drive

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Fastener: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentEP2173413B2Injection device
Publication Date: 2019.08.07 CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL
  • EP2173413B2 patent drawingFigure 1a~1c
  • EP2173413B2 patent drawingFigure 2a
  • EP2173413B2 patent drawingFigure 2b

AI summary

An injection device (110) comprises a locking mechanism (170) between a syringe carrier (127) and a drive mechanism (129) of the injection device. The drive is formed in such a^ way to inhibit movement of the syringe carrier (127) and syringe (114) held by the syringe carrier (127) towards an exit aperture (128) of the injection device when the drive is not itself being forced into a direction towards the exit aperture. This assists in preventing damage to the syringe prior to actuation of the injection device.