Injection Molded Rocker Panel With Transverse Ribs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The automotive industry faces challenges in creating rocker panels that balance aesthetic appeal with enhanced structural support and aerodynamic performance, particularly with newer designs that extend outwardly from the vehicle body, requiring innovative construction methods using alternative materials like plastics.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves an injection molded rocker panel with intermittent transverse ribs positioned perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, providing structural support while maintaining a Class "A" surface aesthetic, and incorporating a foamed core for improved performance-to-weight ratio, along with anti-rotation features and varied wall thickness for enhanced load resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If rocker panels are designed to extend outwardly from the vehicle body to improve aerodynamics and aesthetics, then aerodynamic performance and visual appeal are enhanced, but structural strength and load-bearing capacity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic profileVSAvoidstructural support
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The rocker panel is divided into multiple functional zones: an outwardly extending aerodynamic shell and an internal reinforcement structure with transverse ribs and foam core. This segmentation allows the exterior to maintain aerodynamic shape while the interior provides structural strength independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rocker panel combines multiple materials including polymeric resin, foam core material, and reinforcement ribs to create a composite structure. This composite approach enables the panel to achieve both aerodynamic外形 and structural integrity that single materials cannot provide alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If rocker panels use alternative polymeric materials to reduce manufacturing costs, then production expenses are reduced, but structural integrity and load resistance worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidload resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement ribs are strategically positioned at specific locations within the rocker panel where structural support is most needed. This localized reinforcement approach provides maximum strength enhancement while minimizing the amount of additional material required, maintaining cost-effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The foam core density and rib dimensions are optimized to achieve the required structural performance. By carefully controlling these parameters, the design achieves adequate load resistance with minimal material usage, maintaining manufacturing cost efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If transverse ribs are added to the inside surface to improve structural support, then load-bearing capacity is enhanced, but manufacturing complexity and tooling requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidmolding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transverse ribs, foam core, and skin layers are combined into a single integrated injection molding process. This merging of multiple structural elements into one manufacturing step reduces overall complexity compared to assembling separate components, despite the sophisticated mold design required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Shape

If the rocker panel extends outwardly with larger overall configuration, then aerodynamic performance is improved, but material quantity and manufacturing complexity worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic configurationVSAvoidmaterial usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The rocker panel uses a thin-walled polymeric shell structure that extends outwardly for aerodynamic benefits. The thin-walled design minimizes material usage while the external shape provides the aerodynamic performance, avoiding the need for thick solid sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Data Source

PatentUS8480167B2Injection molded rocker panel
Publication Date: 2013.07.09 ABC TECH INC
  • US8480167B2 patent drawing
  • US8480167B2 patent drawing
  • US8480167B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rocker panel assembly for attachment to a vehicle, comprising a rocker panel body, a first end feature situated on a first end of the rocker panel body, and a second end feature situated on a second end of the rocker panel body. The rocked panel body has an outside surface generally presented in the form of a convex surface, and an inside surface generally presented in the form of a concave surface. The outside surface of the rocker panel body extends outwardly of the vehicle, to present an outboard section having a predetermined profile based on targeted aesthetic/performance characteristics. The inside surface of the rocker panel body has at least one transverse rib positioned therein, the transverse rib being arranged generally perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the rocker panel body.