Injection Molded Thermoplastic Screening Elements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional screening assemblies for vibratory screening machines face issues such as lack of structural stability and durability, blinding of screening openings, high fabrication complexity, and limited configuration options, particularly with thermoset polymer and metal screens.

Innovation Solution

The use of injection molded thermoplastic materials for screen elements, which are securely attached to subgrid structures to form a screen assembly with varying configurations, providing improved mechanical and chemical properties, including small screening openings, structural stability, and ease of assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If thermoset polymer screens are used for fine screening applications, then screening precision is improved, but fabrication complexity increases and manufacturing time is extended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreening opening precisionVSAvoidfabrication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the chemical curing process of thermoset polymers with a mechanical injection molding process using thermoplastic materials. This substitution eliminates the need for complex chemical reactions, mold temperature control, and extended curing times while achieving the same fine screening precision through precise injection molding of thermoplastic screen elements with controlled opening sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material state parameter from thermoset (chemically curing) to thermoplastic (mechanically moldable), and changes the processing temperature parameters to accommodate injection molding. This allows fine screening openings to be created through controlled injection molding parameters rather than complex chemical curing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If thermoset polymer screens are used for fine screening applications, then screening precision is improved, but production time is extended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreening opening precisionVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the time-consuming chemical curing process with a rapid injection molding process. Thermoplastic screen elements can be injection molded and cooled much faster than thermoset polymers can chemically cure, significantly reducing production time while maintaining fine screening precision through controlled molding parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates reinforcement fibers and structural features directly into the mold design before injection molding. This preliminary preparation of the mold structure allows the screen elements to be formed with built-in reinforcement and precise geometry in a single injection cycle, eliminating the need for post-curing or additional reinforcement steps that would extend production time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If metal screen assemblies are used, then durability is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidscreen assembly weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite structure by injection molding thermoplastic screen elements with embedded reinforcement fibers (such as aramid, glass, or carbon fibers). This composite material combines the light weight and flexibility of thermoplastics with the strength and durability of fiber reinforcement, achieving metal-like durability without the associated weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses thin, flexible thermoplastic screen elements with integrated reinforcement rather than rigid metal constructions. These thin-film composite structures provide the necessary durability and vibration resistance while maintaining low weight, unlike traditional metal screen assemblies that require thicker, heavier components to achieve the same strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Stability of the object's composition

If metal screen assemblies are used, then structural stability is improved, but fabrication complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidfabrication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple functions into a single injection-molded thermoplastic screen element: the screening surface, the reinforcement structure, the vibration-damping properties, and the attachment features are all integrated into one component. This eliminates the need for separate metal layers, adhesives, and mechanical fasteners required in traditional metal screen assemblies, reducing fabrication complexity while maintaining structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composite materials that provide structural stability comparable to metal assemblies. The embedded fibers create a rigid yet flexible structure that resists vibration and maintains screening opening geometry, achieving metal-like structural stability through composite material science rather than metal construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

5Strength

If conventional thermoset polymer screens are used, then flexibility is improved, but resistance to vibrational forces deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidvibration resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composite where the flexible thermoplastic matrix maintains flexibility and conformability, while the embedded reinforcement fibers (aramid, glass, or carbon) provide vibration resistance and structural integrity. This composite structure allows the screen to flex and conform to the screening surface while resisting degradation from vibrational forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent strategically places reinforcement fibers in specific regions of the screen element where vibrational stresses are highest, while maintaining the flexible thermoplastic composition in areas requiring conformability and flexibility. This local differentiation of material properties allows the screen to simultaneously exhibit flexibility where needed and vibration resistance where required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3854488B1Injection molded screening apparatuses and methods
Publication Date: 2024.03.20 DERRICK CORP
  • EP3854488B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3854488B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3854488B1 patent drawingFigure 1B

AI summary

Screening members, screening assemblies, methods for fabricating screening members and assemblies and methods for screening materials are provided for vibratory screening machines that incorporate the use of injection molded materials. Use of injection molded screen elements provide, inter alia, for: varying screening surface configurations; fast and relatively simple screen assembly fabrication; and a combination of outstanding screen assembly mechanical and electrical properties, including toughness, wear and chemical resistance. Embodiments of the present invention use a thermoplastic injection molded material.