Injection Molding Binder Composition for Ceramic Parts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing injection molding feedstocks for ceramic and metal parts face issues with insufficient fluidity, cracking, flaking, and environmental concerns due to the use of aggressive chemicals for binder removal, particularly in complex part geometries and when handling metallic materials.

Innovation Solution

A binder composition comprising 35-54% polymeric base, 40-55% waxes or wax-palm oil mixture, and 10% surfactant, with specific copolymers and acrylic resin, enhancing homogeneity and fluidity, and allowing solvent-free heat treatment for binder removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional binder compositions are used for injection molding, then the process can be performed with standard materials, but the feedstock exhibits insufficient fluidity and produces part defects such as cracks and lamination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart qualityVSAvoidfeedstock fluidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The binder composition modifies the physical and chemical parameters of the feedstock by incorporating specific polymers (polyethylene, polypropylene, acrylic resin), waxes (paraffin, microcrystalline), and coupling agents. This changes the rheological properties to achieve optimal fluidity for complex shape injection molding while maintaining structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a composite binder system combining multiple materials with complementary functions: polymers provide structural framework, waxes enhance fluidity and reduce viscosity, and coupling agents improve interfacial adhesion between powder particles and binder. This composite approach resolves the contradiction between fluidity and structural strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If aggressive chemicals are used for organic binder removal, then debinding can be performed, but environmental problems arise and metallic materials may be oxidized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebinding processVSAvoidenvironmental impact and oxidation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The binder composition is designed to be temporarily functional, serving its purpose during injection molding and then being completely removed through debinding and sintering. The use of biodegradable components like plant-based waxes and natural polymers allows for environmentally friendly disposal without aggressive chemicals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The binder materials are selected to facilitate their own removal through controlled decomposition during the sintering process. The organic components serve as temporary support structures that can be thermally decomposed to leave clean inorganic ceramic or metal parts without requiring harsh chemical treatments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Shape

If the binder composition is optimized for fluidity, then complex shaped parts can be manufactured, but the mechanical resistance of green and debinded bodies may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplex shape capabilityVSAvoidmechanical resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The binder composition provides different properties in different phases: in the injected state, the wax and polymer combination provides low viscosity for fluid flow into complex molds; in the green body state, the polymer matrix provides sufficient mechanical strength; during debinding, the binder components are selectively removed. This local quality variation resolves the contradiction between fluidity and strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If production cycle times are reduced, then productivity increases, but the quality and mechanical strength of parts may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction cycle timeVSAvoidpart quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The binder composition is pre-formulated with all necessary components (polymers, waxes, coupling agents, plasticizers) in optimal proportions and distributions. This preliminary preparation ensures that during injection molding and subsequent processing, the feedstock maintains consistent rheological properties and mechanical strength, enabling faster cycle times without quality compromise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution improves the reproducibility and mechanical resistance of parts, reduces cycle times, and eliminates the need for aggressive chemicals, ensuring environmentally friendly production of complex metal or ceramic parts with reduced shrinkage and improved handling.

Implementation Method 1

elimi nating the organic phase by heating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

debinding steaming for the combustion and/or dissolution of certain components of the mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 3

heat treatment of the blank at the end of debinding, for sintering giving its final consistency to the finished component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 4

This heat treatment results in dimensional shrinkage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal contraction: Thermal Contraction

Data Source

PatentEP3643693A1Binder for injection-moulding composition
Publication Date: 2020.04.29 COMADUR
  • EP3643693A1 patent drawing
  • EP3643693A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a binder for injection molding composition comprising: - 35 to 54% vol. of a polymeric base, - 40 to 55% vol. of a mixture of waxes, - and approximately 10% vol. of a surfactant, in which the polymeric base contains copolymers of ethylene and vinyl acetate, as well as polyethylene, polypropylene and an acrylic resin.