Injection Molding Condition Control Using Sensor-Based Defect Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In injection molding, determining the optimal molding conditions to prevent defects is challenging due to various environmental and equipment-related factors, requiring skilled operators and often resulting in defective products.

Innovation Solution

A device using machine learning models to predict molding defects by analyzing molding state data from sensors before the quality element of the molded article is inspected, allowing for adjustments to molding conditions to prevent defects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If machine learning is used to automatically adjust molding conditions based on quality element data obtained after inspection, then the need for manual adjustment by operators is eliminated, but it is not possible to predict defects before the inspection process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic adjustment of molding conditionsVSAvoidtime to detect defects
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by obtaining molding state data during the molding process and using machine learning models to predict quality elements before the actual inspection occurs. This allows defect prediction and molding condition adjustment to happen in advance, enabling preventive rather than reactive quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using the first machine learning model to predict quality elements from molding state data, comparing predicted values with target values, calculating adjustment amounts, and feeding this information back to adjust molding conditions for subsequent production, creating a closed-loop quality control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If molding conditions are adjusted based on quality element data obtained after inspection, then defective articles are detected, but production of defective articles cannot be prevented in real-time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality inspection accuracyVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary prediction of quality elements using machine learning models before the inspection process, allowing molding conditions to be adjusted in advance to prevent defect production, thereby maintaining both quality accuracy and production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the traditional mechanical inspection process with a machine learning-based prediction system that analyzes molding state data to forecast quality elements, enabling real-time defect prevention without requiring physical inspection of each article.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If skilled operators manually determine molding condition changes considering various factors, then molding quality can be maintained, but unskilled operators cannot determine how and what to change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemolding qualityVSAvoidoperator skill requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically analyzing molding state data, predicting quality elements, determining adjustment amounts, and suggesting molding condition changes without requiring operator expertise. The machine learning model performs the complex decision-making that previously required skilled operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the human operator's decision-making process with a machine learning-based system that objectively analyzes molding state data and determines optimal condition adjustments, eliminating the dependency on operator skill level while maintaining molding quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If inspection process is used to obtain quality element data, then defect detection is possible, but defect prediction before inspection cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidearly defect information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the inspection process with a machine learning-based prediction system that forecasts quality elements by analyzing molding state data, enabling defect information to be obtained earlier in the production process without requiring physical inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary machine learning model that bridges the gap between molding state data and quality element outcomes, allowing defect prediction based on intermediate molding parameters before the final inspection point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12202184B2Device for assisting molding condition determination and injection molding apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.01.21 JTEKT CORP
  • US12202184B2 patent drawing
  • US12202184B2 patent drawing
  • US12202184B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for assisting molding condition determination includes a molding state data adjustment amount obtaining unit and a molding condition element adjustment amount obtaining unit. The molding state data adjustment amount obtaining unit obtains, using a first learning model, a molding state data adjustment amount having a value equivalent to a difference between molding state data detected by a sensor and a molding state data target value. The molding condition element adjustment amount obtaining unit obtains, using a second learning model, an adjustment amount for a molding condition element corresponding to the molding state data adjustment amount.