Injection Molding Melt Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current injection molding processes face limitations in using a wide range of thermoplastic materials with varying melt flow indices (MFIs) due to the poor relationship between MFI and behavior in multi-shear-rate flows, leading to tighter tolerances and reduced suitability of resins for processing.

Innovation Solution

A process and apparatus that monitor and control melt pressure and viscosity in real-time using sensors and controllers, allowing for the use of thermoplastic materials with a wider range of MFIs by adjusting injection rates and adding additives like polypropylene wax, to maintain a substantially constant low injection pressure and achieve target cavity pressures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If higher molecular weight polymers are used to improve product performance, then impact resistance and stress-crack resistance are improved, but flow rate through the injection molding apparatus decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidflow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the MFI of the thermoplastic material during the injection molding process. The system uses a feedback control mechanism where a sensor monitors cavity pressure and the controller adjusts MFI accordingly - increasing MFI when cavity pressure is low to improve flow rate, and decreasing MFI when cavity pressure is high to maintain product quality and prevent defects. This dynamic parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction between maintaining high molecular weight for strength and ensuring adequate flow rate for mold filling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If tighter MFI tolerances are imposed to control material behavior, then consistency in processing is improved, but the number of suitable resins is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing consistencyVSAvoidresin selection range
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by transitioning from static MFI specification to dynamic MFI control. Instead of selecting resins based on fixed MFI tolerances, the system continuously adjusts MFI during the injection molding process based on real-time cavity pressure feedback. This dynamic approach allows the use of resins with wider MFI ranges while maintaining consistent processing quality, as the system adapts MFI to match actual processing conditions rather than requiring materials to meet rigid predetermined specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback control where a sensor monitors cavity pressure and provides real-time information to the controller, which then adjusts MFI accordingly. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the system to compensate for variations in resin properties and processing conditions, maintaining manufacturing precision without imposing tight MFI tolerances. The feedback loop allows the system to adapt to different resin types and batches, expanding the range of suitable materials while ensuring consistent product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the use of a broader range of thermoplastic materials, improving plastic article quality by maintaining consistent processing conditions and reducing the need for precise MFI control, thus expanding the MFI window and increasing material variability and cost-effectiveness.

Implementation Method 1

The thermoplastic material is heated such that the thermoplastic material is in a molten state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 2

The melt pressure of the thermoplastic material filling the at least one mold cavity is monitored using a sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing:

Implementation Method 3

The controller controls the injection element thereby changing melt pressure of the thermoplastic material filling the at least one mold cavity based on the signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscosity control:

Implementation Method 4

A molded article is formed by reducing a mold temperature of the thermoplastic material within the at least one mold cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentEP3162529B1Plastic article forming apparatuses and methods for controlling melt flow
Publication Date: 2019.01.02 IMFLUX INC
  • EP3162529B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3162529B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3162529B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A process of forming molded articles using an injection molding apparatus is provided. The process includes providing a thermoplastic material to the injection molding apparatus. The thermoplastic material is heated such that the thermoplastic material is in a molten state. The molten thermoplastic material is injected into at least one mold cavity of the injection molding apparatus using an injection element. A melt pressure of the thermoplastic material filling the at least one mold cavity is monitored using a sensor. The sensor provides a signal indicative of melt pressure in the cavity to a controller. The controller controls the injection element thereby changing melt pressure of the thermoplastic material filling the at least one mold cavity based on the signal to reach a target cavity pressure. A molded article is formed by reducing a mold temperature of the thermoplastic material within the at least one mold cavity.