Fuel Injector Coking Compensation via Operating Range Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern diesel engine fuel injectors experience coking, which reduces nozzle openings and affects fuel injection precision, necessitating a method to control fuel injection and correct for coking to meet stringent emission standards.

Innovation Solution

A method that monitors engine speed and torque output to determine predefined engine operating ranges, calculates a total injector coking factor based on operating time within these ranges, and adjusts fuel injection duration accordingly to compensate for coking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If fuel injection pressure is increased to meet emission standards, then fuel injection precision is improved, but injector coking accelerates and reduces nozzle opening

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel injection precisionVSAvoidinjector coking
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by calculating a coking factor based on engine operating conditions (speed, torque, temperature) and using this factor to pre-adjust the fuel injection duration before the injection event occurs. This proactive adjustment compensates for coking effects without requiring real-time nozzle cleaning or physical intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by dynamically adjusting the fuel injection duration based on the calculated coking factor. As coking progresses and reduces nozzle opening, the system increases injection duration to maintain the required fuel mass delivery, thereby compensating for the degraded nozzle condition while maintaining injection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If fuel injection duration is increased to compensate for coking, then fuel delivery precision is maintained, but injection timing and cycle efficiency may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel delivery precisionVSAvoidinjection cycle efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by making the injection duration adaptive rather than fixed. The injection duration is dynamically adjusted based on real-time engine operating conditions and the calculated coking factor, allowing the system to optimize the balance between compensating for coking and maintaining injection cycle efficiency under varying operational scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring engine speed, torque, and temperature to calculate the coking factor, which then feeds back into the injection control system to adjust subsequent injection durations. This closed-loop approach ensures that compensation is applied only when and where needed, maintaining precision while minimizing impact on cycle efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If real-time coking compensation is implemented, then fuel injection accuracy is maintained over time, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjection accuracy over timeVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies self-service by using readily available sensor data (engine speed, torque, temperature) that already exists in the engine control system to calculate the coking factor and adjust injection duration. No additional sensors or complex external measurement systems are required, allowing the system to self-compensate for coking using its own operational data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system demonstrates universality by making the existing engine control unit perform multiple functions: it continues to manage normal injection control while simultaneously calculating the coking factor and applying compensation adjustments. This multi-functionality avoids adding separate dedicated hardware for coking compensation, thereby limiting the increase in system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9416748B2Method of compensating for injector aging
Publication Date: 2016.08.16 INT ENGINE INTPROP CO LLC
  • US9416748B2 patent drawing
  • US9416748B2 patent drawing
  • US9416748B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling a fuel injector is provided. Engine speed is monitored. Engine torque output is monitored. It is determined if the engine speed is within one of a plurality of predefined engine speed ranges. It is determined if the engine torque output is within one of a plurality of predefined engine torque output ranges. One of a plurality of injector coking factors is assigned based on the determined predefined engine speed range and the determined predefined engine torque output range. A total injector coking factor is calculated based upon total operating time within each of the plurality of injector coking factors. A duration of a fuel injection is increased based upon the calculated total injector coking factor.