Common Rail Injector Plunger Restrictive Cavity Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing closed nozzle fuel injector designs lack efficient manufacturing options and performance enhancements, particularly in terms of precise fuel injection control and emission reduction.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a plunger with distinct outer and inner portions and surface features that guide and bias the needle valve, creating a pressure drop to enhance fuel injection control, including a guiding portion to prevent lateral translation and a restriction portion to bias the needle valve towards a closed position, optimizing fuel injection dynamics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a conventional closed nozzle injector design is used, then the basic fuel injection function is achieved, but manufacturing complexity increases and performance control is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel injection control accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The plunger is divided into two distinct portions: an outer portion with a smaller cross-sectional area and an inner portion with a larger cross-sectional area. This segmentation allows the inner portion to create a restrictive cavity that generates a pressure drop, thereby improving fuel injection control accuracy without requiring complex external machining operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The inner portion of the plunger features a specific geometric configuration with a larger cross-sectional area compared to the outer portion. This local quality difference creates the restrictive cavity that produces the necessary pressure drop, enabling precise fuel injection control while maintaining simple overall manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Speed

If the needle valve opens quickly for fuel injection, then injection speed is improved, but emission control deteriorates due to uncontrolled opening

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneedle valve closing speedVSAvoidemissions
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The restrictive cavity formed by the inner portion of the plunger creates a pressure drop that preliminarily biases the needle valve toward the closed position before injection. This preliminary action ensures controlled opening and rapid closing of the needle valve, improving emission control while maintaining high injection speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If the plunger is designed with simple geometry, then manufacturing is simplified, but lateral translation control is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidplunger positional stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The plunger is segmented into outer and inner portions with distinct cross-sectional areas. The inner portion's larger cross-section creates a restrictive cavity that not only controls fuel flow but also provides lateral stability, preventing unwanted lateral translation while maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The inner portion of the plunger has a locally enhanced cross-sectional area that creates both the restrictive cavity for fuel control and the structural feature needed to prevent lateral translation. This local quality enhancement achieves dual functions without complicating the overall manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design improves fuel injection control and accuracy, enhances emissions by slowing the opening and speeding the closing of the needle valve, and simplifies manufacturing by minimizing complex machining requirements, offering a cost-effective and efficient fuel injection solution.

Implementation Method 1

a restriction portion configured to form a restrictive cavity between an exterior surface of the inner portion and the inner wall of the injector cavity axially along a length of the inner portion, producing a pressure drop along the restrictive cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure drop: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentUS9822748B2Restrictive flow passage in common rail injectors
Publication Date: 2017.11.21 CUMMINS-SCANIA HPCR SYST LLC
  • US9822748B2 patent drawing
  • US9822748B2 patent drawing
  • US9822748B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An injector has an injector body including an injector cavity defining an inner wall and a longitudinal axis, an injector orifice and a plunger slidably disposed within the injector cavity. The plunger has an outer portion and an inner portion at different locations longitudinally along the plunger. The inner portion has a plurality of surface portions including a guiding portion configured to substantially mate with the inner wall of the injector cavity, guide the plunger to slidably move in a direction along the longitudinal axis and substantially prevent the plunger from laterally translating within the injector cavity. The plurality of surface portions also includes a restriction portion configured to form a restrictive cavity between an exterior surface of the inner portion and the inner wall of the injector cavity axially along a length of the inner portion.