Internal Combustion Engine Injector Condition Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing internal combustion engines replace injectors based on service life rather than their actual condition, leading to unnecessary replacements and potential inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

An algorithm stored in the control device calculates the injector's state using input variables and a model, comparing it to a target state to determine if replacement is necessary due to wear, damage, or other changes, allowing for condition-based maintenance by monitoring key variables like actuator control signals and sensor measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If injectors are replaced based on service life (number of operating hours), then maintenance scheduling is simplified, but unnecessary replacements occur and maintenance efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance schedulingVSAvoidmaintenance efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors injection quantity through sensors and compares actual values against target values. This feedback mechanism enables real-time detection of injector performance degradation, allowing maintenance to be triggered only when actually needed rather than following a fixed schedule. The control device processes measurement values and generates maintenance indications based on actual injector state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The injector system performs self-diagnosis by monitoring its own injection quantity through integrated sensors and control electronics. The system automatically detects when an injector deviates from expected performance and generates maintenance indications without external intervention, enabling the system to serve its own maintenance needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If injectors are replaced based on service life, then component reliability is maintained through regular replacement, but loss of time and resources occur due to unnecessary replacements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent reliabilityVSAvoiddowntime for replacement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Continuous monitoring of injection quantity provides real-time feedback on injector health status. By comparing actual injection values against target values and tracking deviations over time, the system can reliably determine when an injector truly needs replacement, maintaining component reliability through condition-based rather than time-based replacement criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from time-based replacement parameters (service hours) to condition-based parameters (injection quantity deviation). By monitoring parameters such as injection quantity, pressure progression, and needle position, the system identifies when actual injector performance warrants replacement, eliminating unnecessary replacements and associated downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If condition monitoring is implemented to assess injector state, then maintenance precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional sensors and algorithms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjector state assessmentVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device utilizes existing sensors to measure injection quantity and compares these measurements against target values stored in memory. This feedback approach achieves precise injector state assessment by evaluating the difference between actual and expected performance, leveraging already-present measurement capabilities rather than requiring entirely new sensing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual model of injector behavior by storing target injection values and comparing them against actual measurements. This copying approach allows precise state assessment by comparing real-world performance against a reference model, achieving accurate monitoring without requiring complex physical modifications to the injector itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11035309B2Internal combustion engine with injection quantity control
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 GE JENBACHER GMBH & CO OG
  • US11035309B2 patent drawing
  • US11035309B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An internal combustion engine is provided. The internal combustion engine includes a control device, and at least one injector for liquid fuel. The injector(s) can be controlled by the control device via an actuator control signal. The injector(s) include an injector outlet opening for the liquid fuel which can be closed by a needle. A sensor is also provided for measuring a measurement variable of the injector(s). The sensor is or can be in a signal connection with the control device. An algorithm is stored in the control device, which algorithm calculates a state of the injector(s) based on input variables and an injector model, compares the state calculated via the injector model with a target state, and produces a state signal in accordance therewith. The state signal is characteristic of a change in the state of the injector(s) that occurs during intended use of the injector(s) and/or an unforeseen change in the state of the injector(s). The input variables include at least the actuator control signal and the measurement values of the sensor. A method for operating such an internal combustion engine and an injector is also provided.