Ink Delivery System Orientation via Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ink delivery systems are limited by gravity and require specific height configurations, making it difficult to deliver ink to print heads at non-vertical angles or orientations, and often struggle with efficient ink distribution.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a system of interconnected tanks with pressure differentials and pumps to maintain constant meniscus pressure across flow-through print heads, allowing ink to be controllably dispensed regardless of orientation, using conduits and flow restrictors to regulate ink flow and pressure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If gravity feed systems are used to deliver ink, then the system is simple and passive, but it requires specific height configurations and cannot print at non-vertical angles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting orientation capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies pneumatic principles by using pressurized air to deliver ink through a fluid communication system. The air pressure forces ink through conduits and past flow restrictors to the print head, replacing gravity-dependent flow with pressure-driven flow, enabling printing at any orientation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the driving parameter for ink flow from gravitational force to pressure differential. By controlling air pressure in the first tank and vacuum pressure in the second tank, the system can maintain consistent ink flow regardless of orientation, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If pumps are added to control pressure differentials, then ink flow can be controlled at any orientation, but the system becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting orientation capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses pneumatic pressure from an air supply and vacuum from a vacuum supply to control ink flow, replacing mechanical pumps with fluid pressure control. This achieves oriented printing capability while using different types of control mechanisms that may be more integrated into the system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

3Reliability

If conventional ink delivery systems are used, then the system is simple, but it cannot maintain constant meniscus pressure when orientation changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeniscus pressure consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates level sensors that detect ink levels in the tanks and provide feedback to the controller. The controller adjusts air pressure and vacuum levels accordingly to maintain constant meniscus pressure at the print head, ensuring reliable ink flow during orientation changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes pressure parameters (air pressure in first tank, vacuum pressure in second tank) in response to orientation changes and ink level feedback, maintaining constant meniscus pressure through active parameter control rather than passive gravity-dependent flow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables ink delivery to print heads at any orientation relative to gravity, ensuring consistent ink flow and meniscus pressure, facilitating printing at various angles without the need for gravity-dependent setups, and allowing for dynamic orientation changes during printing.

Implementation Method 1

The method provides a pressure differential across the print heads to cause ink to flow through the print heads and into one of the tanks

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

maintain a substantially constant meniscus pressure at the plurality of print heads

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMeniscus pressure: Capillary Pressure

Data Source

PatentEP2416965B1Ink delivery system
Publication Date: 2016.08.10 PLASTIPAK PACKAGING INC
  • EP2416965B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2416965B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP2416965B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

An ink delivery system includes a first tank including a fill sensor; a second tank including a fill sensor; a pump configured to pump ink from the first tank to the second tank; a third tank including a fill sensor; a print head in fluid communication with the second tank and the third tank. In an embodiment, the third tank is in fluid communication with the first tank and may be configured to provide a closed loop system, the second tank is in fluid communication with the third tank, and a pressure differential across the print head causes ink to flow through the print head. For some embodiments, pumps may be provided to control pressure differentials and print heads may print at one or more angles.