Inkjet Ink-Drop Measurement Tables for Nozzle Variation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for restricting the total amount of ink drop in printing fail to account for environmental factors and nozzle variations, leading to inaccuracies in ink application and degraded image quality.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that measures the actual amount of ink drop from nozzles, creates a conversion table based on this measurement, and restricts the total ink drop accordingly, addressing environmental and nozzle-specific variations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the total amount of ink drop is restricted based on a predetermined value without measurement, then the restriction process is simple and fast, but the accuracy of ink application is poor due to environmental factors and nozzle variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of ink applicationVSAvoidcomplexity of measurement and control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement of the actual ink drop amount from each nozzle before the actual printing process. This measurement data is stored and used to create a correction table that compensates for nozzle variations and environmental factors, ensuring accurate ink application from the start without requiring complex real-time adjustments during printing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the measured actual ink drop amounts are used to update the conversion table. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from actual nozzle performance and environmental conditions, continuously improving the accuracy of ink application by adjusting the conversion between gradation values and ink drop amounts based on real measurement data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If a fixed conversion table is used without considering nozzle variations, then the processing is simple and fast, but image quality degrades due to inaccuracies in ink application

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidtime for measurement and table creation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement of the actual ink drop amount from each nozzle before the actual printing process. This measurement data is stored and used to create a correction table that compensates for nozzle variations and environmental factors, ensuring accurate ink application from the start without requiring complex real-time adjustments during printing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of the conversion table based on measured data. Instead of using a fixed conversion table, the system dynamically adjusts the conversion parameters between gradation values and ink drop amounts based on actual nozzle performance measurements, thereby improving image quality by accounting for individual nozzle characteristics and environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the ink drop amount is not accurately controlled, then the printing process is fast and simple, but color reproduction range is limited and printer failures occur due to excessive ink adhesion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting speedVSAvoidprinter reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces mechanical trial-and-error adjustment with an automated measurement and control system. By using sensors to measure actual ink drop amounts and automatically updating the conversion table based on measured data, the system eliminates the need for manual adjustment while ensuring reliable and consistent ink application, preventing both excessive ink adhesion and color reproduction issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250256504A1Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and non-transitory recording medium
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 RICOH CO LTD
  • US20250256504A1 patent drawing
  • US20250256504A1 patent drawing
  • US20250256504A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes circuitry to obtain a measurement result of an amount of ink drop discharged from one or more nozzles of an inkjet head in response to receiving a signal for starting a restriction on a total amount of ink drop, create a table used for converting a gradation value into the amount of ink drop based on the measurement result of the amount of ink drop, and restrict a total amount of ink drop corresponding to the gradation value using the table.