Ink Formulation for Indirect Aqueous Printing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for an ink with enhanced wetting properties for indirect aqueous printing applications that utilize a sacrificial layer, as existing inks do not effectively improve wetting and spreading on various substrates.

Innovation Solution

The ink formulation includes a combination of latexes, amines, pigments, solvents, anti-foaming agents, and surfactants, optimized to achieve improved wetting and spreading characteristics, with specific solvent blends and surfactants selected to minimize viscosity and maximize surface tension for enhanced jetting and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional ink formulations are used in indirect aqueous printing, then the printing process can be maintained with existing components, but the wetting and spreading performance on substrates is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewetting and spreading performanceVSAvoidperformance on various substrates
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the ink formulation by adjusting the concentration and type of surfactants (0.01-5 wt%), selecting specific solvent combinations (water, alcohol, ketone, ester), and controlling polymer latex properties (molecular weight, composition) to optimize wetting and spreading parameters for different substrate types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The ink uses a composite formulation combining multiple components: surfactants (ionic and non-ionic), polymer latex (polyacrylic acid, polyvinyl alcohol), solvents (water, alcohol, ketone, ester), and pigments, creating a synergistic system that achieves enhanced wetting and spreading across various substrates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If the ink viscosity is reduced to improve jetting, then printing efficiency increases, but ink stability and prevention of aggregation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejetting efficiencyVSAvoidink stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes viscosity by selecting specific solvent combinations (water, alcohol, ketone, ester) and controlling their proportions, adjusting polymer latex molecular weight and composition, and modifying surfactant concentrations to achieve the desired balance between jetting performance and stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Surfactants act as intermediary agents that reduce surface tension and improve wetting while also stabilizing the ink formulation by preventing polymer aggregation and maintaining uniform distribution of components during jetting and printing processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If surfactant concentration is increased to improve wetting, then spreading performance enhances, but foam formation and printing stability worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewetting performanceVSAvoidfoam formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes surfactant concentration (0.01-5 wt%) and selects specific types (ionic and non-ionic surfactants) to achieve effective wetting while minimizing foam formation, balancing the competing requirements through precise parameter control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses surfactants that can reduce surface tension to improve wetting while simultaneously having anti-foaming properties or being compatible with anti-foaming agents, converting the potential harm of foam formation into a manageable parameter through careful surfactant selection and concentration control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The ink exhibits improved wetting and spreading performance, allowing for efficient printing with reduced ink consumption and maintaining stability over time, even after prolonged idle periods, without nozzle blocking or latex aggregation.

Implementation Method 1

one or more surfactants in an amount from about 0.001 wt % to about 3 wt %

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurfactant: Surfactant

Implementation Method 2

The ink may have a surface tension from about 10 dynes/cm to about 40 dynes/cm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface tension: Surface Tension

Implementation Method 3

The four or more solvents, when combined, may have a viscosity that is less than or equal to about 75 centipoise at 32° C. The ink may have a jetting viscosity from about 3 centipoise to about 8 centipoise at 32° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscosity:

Implementation Method 4

The polymer latex may include an aqueous dispersion of polymer particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCoagulation: Coagulation

Data Source

PatentUS9309419B2Ink with enhanced wetting properties
Publication Date: 2016.04.12 XEROX CORP
  • US9309419B2 patent drawing
  • US9309419B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An ink for a printer may include one or more latexes in an amount from about 0.1 wt % to about 15 wt %, one or more amines in an amount from about 0 wt % to about 2 wt %, and one or more pigments in an amount from about 0.5 wt % to about 8 wt %. The ink may also include four or more solvents that, in the aggregate, are present in an amount from about 10 wt % to about 50 wt %. The ink may further include one or more surfactants in an amount from about 0.001 wt % to about 3 wt %.