Liquid Ejecting Device Ink Refilling Pressure Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ink refilling systems for high-flow rate applications face pressure loss due to fluid resistance in long tubes, leading to insufficient refilling and instability in ink ejection, particularly in large-format printing, where existing solutions either fail to ensure efficient air bubble discharge or adequate ink refilling.

Innovation Solution

A liquid ejecting device with a head tank, pressure adjusting tank, and dual liquid sending devices that maintain negative pressure in the head tank, allowing on-demand ink feeding and efficient air bubble discharge through a system with controlled flow resistance and air discharging ports, ensuring stable and high-speed ink delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If the length of tube is increased to feed ink to head tank, then the coverage area is improved, but the pressure loss due to fluid resistance increases causing insufficient refilling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The ink feeding system is segmented into two independent pathways: a first liquid sending device for ink supply and a second liquid sending device for air bubble discharge. This segmentation allows each pathway to be optimized independently, with the discharge pathway having lower fluid resistance to maintain pressure differential.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system preliminarily establishes a pressure differential by providing a discharge pathway with lower fluid resistance than the supply pathway. This pre-established pressure difference prevents backflow and ensures unidirectional ink flow, counteracting the pressure loss in long supply tubes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Productivity

If the flow rate of ink is increased to improve printing throughput, then the productivity is improved, but the pressure loss increases causing insufficient refilling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting throughputVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates ink supply and air bubble discharge into different pathways with different flow rate requirements. The discharge pathway is designed with lower fluid resistance to handle high flow rates of air bubbles without significant pressure loss, while the supply pathway can operate at lower flow rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes pneumatic principles by introducing air bubbles into the ink stream. The air bubbles rise through the ink due to buoyancy, and the second liquid sending device facilitates this气液 separation process, allowing high-speed ink ejection without proportional increases in supply pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

3Productivity

If the length of head is increased to increase number of nozzle heads, then the productivity is improved, but the efficiency of air bubble discharge is deteriorated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of nozzle headsVSAvoidair bubble discharge efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The discharge pathway is segmented as a separate system with dedicated low-resistance channels. This allows air bubbles from multiple nozzle heads to be efficiently collected and discharged through a common pathway designed specifically for gas-liquid separation, maintaining high discharge efficiency regardless of head length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a vertical dimension to air bubble discharge by utilizing buoyancy forces. Air bubbles naturally rise upward in the ink stream, and the second liquid sending device is positioned to facilitate this upward movement, creating a three-dimensional flow pattern that efficiently separates gases from liquids across the entire head length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Adaptability or versatility

If tube length is increased for large-sized printing medium, then the adaptability is improved, but the ejection stability is deteriorated due to pressure loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting medium sizeVSAvoidejection stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system preliminarily establishes a pressure differential between supply and discharge pathways to prevent backflow and maintain unidirectional ink flow. This pre-established pressure gradient compensates for pressure losses in long tubes, ensuring stable ink delivery to the nozzle regardless of tube length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback control by monitoring the pressure differential between the ink supply and discharge pathways. The second liquid sending device adjusts its operation based on the accumulated air bubbles and pressure conditions, maintaining optimal flow conditions for stable ejection even over long tube lengths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution prevents insufficient refilling and ensures stable, high-speed ink delivery even with increased flow rates and long tubes, improving ejection stability and reliability by maintaining appropriate negative pressure and facilitating air bubble discharge.

Implementation Method 1

a first liquid sending device configured to send liquid from the liquid storing container to the head tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

maintain negative pressure in the head tank, allowing on-demand ink feeding and efficient air bubble discharge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNegative pressure: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 3

a vibration plate is provided on a part of the wall of a liquid chamber filled with ink and the vibrating plate is displaced by a piezoelectric actuator or the like so as to change the volume of the liquid chamber and increase the pressure therein

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure increase: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS8141996B2Liquid ejecting device and image forming apparatus
Publication Date: 2012.03.27 RICOH CO LTD
  • US8141996B2 patent drawing
  • US8141996B2 patent drawing
  • US8141996B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a liquid ejecting device including a liquid ejecting head including a liquid ejecting nozzle, a head tank configured to store liquid to be fed to the liquid ejecting head, a liquid storing container configured to store liquid to be fed to the head tank, a first liquid sending device configured to send liquid from the liquid storing container to the head tank, a pressure adjusting tank configured to store liquid suctioned from the liquid ejecting head, and a second liquid sending device configured to send liquid from the liquid ejecting head to the pressure adjusting tank, wherein the head tank includes a liquid receiving port configured to receive liquid from the liquid storing container via a liquid receiving valve being opened at a predetermined or less pressure and a liquid feeding port configured to feed liquid to the liquid ejecting head and the liquid ejecting head includes a liquid inflow port communicating with the liquid feeding port and a liquid outflow port communicating with the pressure adjusting tank via the second liquid sending device.