Selective Inkjet Defect Detection via Image Sensor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inkjet defect detection in printers is inefficient as it often requires frequent testing of all inkjets, wasting system resources and ink, and does not account for varying failure rates among inkjets, leading to unnecessary testing of less prone inkjets.

Innovation Solution

Implement a method using an image sensor to selectively test inkjets based on their likelihood of failure, adjusting the testing frequency and scope according to failure probability data, and using a bit counter to track inkjet activity to identify which inkjets to test, thereby reducing resource wastage and optimizing maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all inkjets are tested frequently to detect defects, then defect detection reliability is improved, but system resources and ink are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection reliabilityVSAvoidsystem resources and ink
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating treatment for different inkjets based on their individual failure probabilities. Instead of uniform testing of all inkjets, the system identifies specific inkjets with higher failure probabilities (through monitoring drop characteristics, ejection frequency, and operational history) and targets those for testing. This localized approach ensures reliable defect detection for at-risk inkjets while avoiding unnecessary testing of reliable inkjets, thereby reducing waste of system resources and ink.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by dynamically adjusting testing frequency and scope based on monitored parameters such as drop mass, drop velocity, directionality, and ejection frequency. When parameters indicate an inkjet is approaching failure thresholds, testing frequency increases. When parameters show stable performance, testing frequency decreases. This adaptive parameter adjustment maintains detection reliability while optimizing resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If all inkjets are tested at the same frequency, then detection consistency is maintained, but less prone inkjets are unnecessarily tested

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection consistencyVSAvoidtesting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by assigning different testing frequencies to different inkjets based on their individual failure probabilities. Inkjets with higher failure probabilities receive more frequent testing, while those with lower failure probabilities are tested less frequently. This differentiated approach maintains detection consistency for at-risk components while improving overall testing efficiency by avoiding redundant testing of reliable inkjets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the testing schedule adaptive rather than static. The system continuously monitors inkjet performance parameters and dynamically adjusts testing frequencies based on real-time conditions. When an inkjet's performance deteriorates, testing frequency increases automatically. When performance is stable, testing frequency decreases. This dynamic adjustment maintains detection consistency where needed while optimizing productivity overall.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If frequent testing is performed to maintain inkjet reliability, then defect detection is improved, but time and resources are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinkjet reliabilityVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by using monitored parameters (drop characteristics, ejection frequency, operational history) to predict failure probabilities. These parameters enable the system to adjust testing timing strategically - performing tests when parameters indicate approaching failure thresholds rather than at fixed frequent intervals. This maintains inkjet reliability through timely detection while reducing unnecessary testing time and resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by using performance parameter monitoring to predict potential failures before they occur. The system identifies inkjets that are likely to fail based on trends in drop mass, velocity, and ejection frequency, and schedules testing in advance for these at-risk inkjets. This proactive approach ensures reliability is maintained through early detection while avoiding the time waste of reactive testing after failures occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces unnecessary testing, conserves resources, and optimizes maintenance by targeting only likely defective inkjets, enhancing printer reliability and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

An IOD sensor is a sensor configured to monitor, for example, the presence, intensity, and/or location of marking material jetted on the intermediate substrate by the inkjets of a print head. An IOD sensor could generally include, for example, a light source and one or more optical detectors situated to detect marking material on the intermediate substrate.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical detection: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS7623254B2Systems and methods for detecting inkjet defects
Publication Date: 2009.11.24 XEROX CORP
  • US7623254B2 patent drawing
  • US7623254B2 patent drawing
  • US7623254B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for testing inkjets for defects in an inkjet device includes determining, based on the likelihood that one or more inkjets are defective, whether to perform an inkjet defect test, The method may also include, identifying, if it is determined to perform an inkjet defect test, which inkjets to test based on properties of the inkjets, the number of identified inkjets being less than a total number of inkjets in the inkjet device; and testing the identified inkjets for defects using an image sensor.