Inkjet Print Correction for Optical Density and Gloss Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing inkjet printing systems struggle to achieve accurate application amounts of reaction liquids and color materials on non-absorbent printing media, leading to inconsistent optical density and glossiness, as existing correction methods fail to account for the interdependence of these factors.

Innovation Solution

A printing apparatus and method that includes a controller to generate correction information based on optical density and specular reflection intensity measurements of test patterns, adjusting the application amounts of both reaction liquid and color material inks to match target values for both optical density and glossiness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If only one of the reaction liquid or the ink is corrected for application amount, then the optical density or gloss can match the target value, but the other parameter (gloss or optical density) cannot simultaneously match its target value

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical density accuracyVSAvoidgloss accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters being controlled from separate single-parameter corrections to joint two-parameter corrections. By simultaneously adjusting both the ink application amount and reaction liquid application amount based on their respective target values (optical density target and gloss target), the system resolves the contradiction where correcting one parameter causes the other to deviate from its target.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the application amount of reaction liquid and ink are not accurately controlled, then the printing process is simple, but the optical density and glossiness become inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical density and gloss consistencyVSAvoidcorrection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the actual optical density and glossiness of printed patches are measured and compared against target values. The application amounts of ink and reaction liquid are then corrected based on the deviations detected, creating a closed-loop control system that ensures consistent optical density and glossiness across prints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary correction by printing test patches with varying application amounts of ink and reaction liquid before actual production printing. The optimal combination of application amounts is determined in advance through measurement and calculation, and this correction information is stored for use in subsequent printing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If the ratio between reaction liquid application amount and ink application amount is not optimized, then the printing process is straightforward, but the optical density and gloss change inconsistently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical density and gloss stabilityVSAvoidcolor deviation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the ratio between reaction liquid application amount and ink application amount by treating them as interdependent parameters. Through measurement of test patches and calculation of correction values, the system determines the optimal ratio that stabilizes both optical density and gloss, resolving the inconsistency that arises when the ratio is not properly controlled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively corrects for color deviation and ensures that the printed image achieves both target optical density and glossiness by dynamically adjusting the application amounts of reaction liquid and color material inks, thereby improving image quality on non-absorbent media.

Implementation Method 1

the ink containing a color material is made to react with a reaction liquid, and the color material is made to aggregate to thicken the ink

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAggregation: Coagulation

Implementation Method 2

a first obtaining unit configured to obtain an optical density for each of the plurality of patches

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical density measurement: Absorption Spectroscopy

Implementation Method 3

a second obtaining unit configured to obtain a specular reflection intensity for each of the plurality of patches

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpecular reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS12528298B2Printing apparatus, control method, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2026.01.20 CANON KK
  • US12528298B2 patent drawing
  • US12528298B2 patent drawing
  • US12528298B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A printing apparatus includes: a printing unit configured to eject a color material ink and a reaction liquid; a controller configured to control the printing unit such that the printing unit prints a first test pattern in which a plurality of patches are arranged; a first obtaining unit configured to obtain an optical density for each of the plurality of patches; a second obtaining unit configured to obtain a specular reflection intensity for each of the plurality of patches; and a first generation unit configured to generate correction information based on the optical density obtained by the first obtaining unit, the specular reflection intensity obtained by the second obtaining unit, a first target value of the optical density for a first input value of the color material ink, and a second target value of the specular reflection intensity for a second input value of the reaction liquid.