Inkjet Nozzle Ejection Sequencing to Reduce Landing Position Variation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

When the number of ejection operations is equal among a plurality of nozzles that eject ink on the same raster line, image quality can degrade due to variations in the landing positions of ink droplets.

Innovation Solution

A liquid ejecting apparatus with a head unit comprising two nozzle columns aligned in different directions, where the controller controls the ejection operations such that the number of ejections for each nozzle varies, specifically, the number of ejection operations of one nozzle is larger than that of an adjacent nozzle, reducing the frequency of simultaneous ejections by adjacent nozzles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the number of ejection operations is equal among multiple nozzles on the same raster line, then the workload is balanced, but image quality degrades due to variations in ink landing positions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkload balanceVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by intentionally making the number of ejection operations different for nozzles on the same raster line. Specifically, nozzles are configured to have unequal ejection counts (e.g., one nozzle ejects more times than its neighbor), which compensates for variations in ink landing positions and improves overall image quality while maintaining acceptable workload distribution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Productivity

If multiple nozzles perform ejection operations simultaneously on the same raster line, then productivity is maintained, but air flow disturbances increase causing ink landing position variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejection throughputVSAvoidair flow disturbance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by controlling nozzles to eject ink in alternating sequences rather than simultaneously. Nozzles on the same raster line are assigned different ejection timings within a periodic cycle, which reduces air flow disturbances and ink landing position variations while maintaining overall ejection throughput through coordinated periodic operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12565036B2Liquid ejecting apparatus and liquid ejection method
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US12565036B2 patent drawing
  • US12565036B2 patent drawing
  • US12565036B2 patent drawing

AI summary

a controller controls ejection operations such that the number of ejection operations of the first nozzle is larger than the number of ejection operations of the second nozzle and the number of ejection operations of the fourth nozzle is larger than the number of ejection operations of the third nozzle.