Inkjet Head Driving Method Prevents Erroneous Ejection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In share mode type inkjet heads, where an actuator is shared between adjacent ink chambers, there is a risk of erroneous ink ejection due to simultaneous actuation of adjacent ink chambers, leading to incorrect ink droplet formation and gradation in multi-drop driving systems.

Innovation Solution

A driving method and device that apply ejection and auxiliary pulse signals at different timings to create a potential difference between electrodes, ensuring that the two pulse signals are not applied simultaneously, thereby preventing actuation of adjacent ink chambers and maintaining accurate ink droplet ejection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If an actuator is shared between adjacent ink chambers to reduce device complexity, then the number of actuators is reduced, but erroneous ink ejection occurs due to simultaneous actuation of adjacent ink chambers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of actuatorsVSAvoidink ejection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by outputting the drive pulse signal to the first ink chamber before the second ink chamber. This timing sequence ensures that the shared actuator is actuated in advance for the first chamber, and the second chamber is then actuated subsequently, preventing simultaneous actuation that would cause erroneous ink ejection. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining shared actuator design while ensuring reliable sequential operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If auxiliary pulse signals are output to all ink chambers including non-ejecting nozzles, then actuator vibration is controlled, but the ejection pulse signal cannot be output simultaneously to adjacent ink chambers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator vibration controlVSAvoidejection pulse signal output capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by outputting the auxiliary pulse signal to the first ink chamber before the ejection pulse signal to the second ink chamber. This timing arrangement allows the auxiliary pulse to prepare the shared actuator for the upcoming ejection operation in the second chamber, enabling both vibration control and simultaneous ejection capability without interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic action through the sequential timing of auxiliary and ejection pulse signals. The auxiliary pulse is output in one timing period, followed by the ejection pulse in a subsequent period, creating a periodic sequence that allows both signal types to be output without simultaneous conflict, thus maintaining both vibration control and ejection functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Ease of operation

If the ejection pulse signal is output to a nozzle that does not eject ink drops, then the shared actuator is actuated, but ink may be ejected erroneously from adjacent ink chambers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator controlVSAvoiderroneous ink ejection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by outputting the auxiliary pulse signal to the first ink chamber before the ejection pulse signal to the second ink chamber. This preliminary actuation of the first chamber prepares the shared actuator in advance, allowing the second chamber's ejection pulse to be output subsequently without causing erroneous ejection from the first chamber, thus maintaining ease of operation while preventing harmful effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures precise control over ink droplet ejection, preventing erroneous ejections and maintaining the intended gradation in multi-drop systems by ensuring that the ejection pulse signal and auxiliary pulse signal are not applied simultaneously, thus improving the accuracy and reliability of inkjet head operation.

Implementation Method 1

a piezoelectric element, which deforms in response to a drive signal, is provided in each ink chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS8939532B2Inkjet head driving method and driving device
Publication Date: 2015.01.27 RISO TECH CORP
  • US8939532B2 patent drawing
  • US8939532B2 patent drawing
  • US8939532B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, a driving device applies an ejection pulse signal that deforms a partition in such a way that an ink drop is ejected from a nozzle and an auxiliary pulse signal that deforms the partition to such an extent that an ink drop is not ejected from the nozzle, as a drive signal for providing a potential difference between electrodes, to an inkjet head at different timings so that the two pulse signals are not applied simultaneously. A constraint on output of the auxiliary pulse signal is significantly relaxed.