Inkjet Maintenance Control for Jammed Paper Aggregate Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ink jet recording apparatuses face issues with removing aggregates or precipitates from the ink ejection surface during paper jams, leading to defective ink ejection and increased wasteful ink consumption, even after purge and wiping operations.

Innovation Solution

An image recording apparatus with a sheet conveying unit, ink ejection head, pretreatment liquid ejection head, purge unit, wiping unit, paper jam detection unit, and maintenance control unit performs a first maintenance operation with reduced ink discharge and slower wiping speed to effectively remove aggregates or precipitates while minimizing ink consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the purge unit forcibly discharges ink from the nozzle and the wiping unit wipes the ink ejection surface with normal parameters, then the meniscus of the nozzle is recovered and ink attached to the ink ejection surface is removed, but the aggregate or precipitate caused by reaction liquid cannot be sufficiently removed and may spread over the ink ejection surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveink ejection functionVSAvoidink ejection surface cleanliness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters of the wiping operation by reducing the wiping speed to a specific range (0.1 to 10 mm/s) and controlling the contact pressure of the wiper. This parameter adjustment allows the wiper to effectively remove aggregates and precipitates without spreading them, resolving the contradiction between recovering ink ejection function and maintaining ink ejection surface cleanliness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the same wiping operation is performed regardless of paper jam position, then the ink ejection surface is cleaned, but ink is wasted and the aggregate or precipitate may spread

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveink ejection surface cleanlinessVSAvoidink consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs a preliminary detection of paper jam position and determines whether the reaction liquid ejection head is upstream of the jam location. Based on this preliminary assessment, it selectively executes the first wiping operation only when necessary, avoiding unnecessary ink discharge and wiping operations, thus reducing ink waste while maintaining cleaning effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces different wiping parameters for different situations: the first wiping operation uses reduced speed (0.1 to 10 mm/s) for aggregate removal, while the second wiping operation uses normal speed for routine cleaning. This parameter differentiation optimizes ink consumption by applying intensive cleaning only when aggregates are present.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the wiper blade wipes the ink ejection surface at normal speed, then the ink ejection surface is cleaned quickly, but the aggregate or precipitate spreads over the ink ejection surface causing defective ink ejection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewiping speedVSAvoidink ejection quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the wiping speed parameter to a controlled low range (0.1 to 10 mm/s) during the first wiping operation when aggregates are present. This slow wiping prevents the spread of aggregates across the ink ejection surface while still achieving effective cleaning, thereby maintaining ink ejection quality. The system can then perform a second faster wiping operation to restore normal productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution reliably removes aggregates or precipitates from the ink ejection surface, reducing wasteful ink consumption and ensuring proper ink ejection, even when paper jams occur.

Implementation Method 1

the wiping unit having a wiper wiping the ink ejection surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a purge unit for forcibly discharging ink from the nozzle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS8534795B2Image recording apparatus
Publication Date: 2013.09.17 BROTHER KOGYO KK
  • US8534795B2 patent drawing
  • US8534795B2 patent drawing
  • US8534795B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image recording apparatus includes: a sheet conveying unit; an ink ejection head having a nozzle and an ink ejection surface; a pretreatment liquid ejection head; a purge unit; a wiping unit having a wiper; a paper jam detection unit detecting a position when the recording sheet is jammed; and a maintenance control unit, wherein, when the paper jam detection unit detects a paper jam on the downstream side from the pretreatment liquid ejection head, the maintenance control unit performs a first maintenance operation, in which the purge unit discharges ink from the ink ejection head, and the wiping unit wipes the ink ejection surface with the wiper, and in the first maintenance operation, the maintenance control unit performs control such that a discharge amount of ink to be discharged from the ink ejection head decreases or the wiping speed when the ink ejection surface is wiped decreases.