Inkjet Nozzle Correction for Density and Color Shift

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inkjet printing technologies face challenges in maintaining color accuracy due to variations in ink ejection volumes among nozzles, leading to density unevenness and color shifts when printing with multiple inks, despite the use of head shading techniques.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus and method that selects and applies correction parameters based on the specific printing characteristic ranks of nozzles for each ink combination, adjusting image data to account for variations in ink ejection volumes, thereby reducing color shifts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If head shading technique is used to correct ink ejection volume variations, then density unevenness is reduced, but color shift occurs when multiple inks are overlapped

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedensity uniformityVSAvoidcolor accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the correction parameters based on the combination of ink colors being printed. Different correction values are applied depending on whether a single ink or multiple inks are involved, allowing the system to optimize for either density uniformity or color accuracy based on the specific printing scenario

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different correction strategies to different situations: when a single ink is printed, head shading is applied for density uniformity; when multiple inks are overlapped, different correction parameters are used to maintain color accuracy. This localized approach to correction resolves the contradiction by adapting the correction method to the specific printing context

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If correction parameters are applied to adjust ink ejection volume variations, then density uniformity improves, but color reproduction accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedensity uniformityVSAvoidcolor reproduction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically selects correction parameters based on the printing conditions, specifically the combination of inks being used. The correction approach transitions from static head shading to a dynamic system that adapts correction strength and method based on whether multiple inks are involved, thereby maintaining both density uniformity and color accuracy across different scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9694598B2Image processing apparatus, ink jet printing apparatus, and image processing method
Publication Date: 2017.07.04 CANON KK
  • US9694598B2 patent drawing
  • US9694598B2 patent drawing
  • US9694598B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Printing heads of combinations of four ink colors and seven printing characteristic ranks are previously used to print an image for measurement, and table parameters corresponding to all of the combinations of nozzle ink colors and printing characteristic ranks are obtained on the basis of a measurement result of this image for measurement and stored in a memory. Then, when printing is actually performed in a printer, a primary color image for measurement is printed for each nozzle of a printing head for each of four ink colors. A printing characteristic rank for each nozzle is obtained for each of four ink colors based on a measurement result of this image for measurement, and a table parameter is selected that corresponds to the same combination as the combination of the obtained printing characteristic rank of each nozzle of four ink colors, by referring to the memory.