Inkjet Printer Nozzle Defect Compensation via Dynamic Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ink jet printers face issues with defective nozzles causing dot omission and stripe formation in printed images due to clogging or positional errors, especially in overlapping printing modes where defective nozzles at the end or within overlapping regions lead to noticeable defects.

Innovation Solution

A recording apparatus with multiple nozzles and complementing units that include substitute and vicinity formation nozzles, along with a selection unit to choose the appropriate complementing unit based on error amounts, allowing for effective dot complementation using either substitute nozzle complementation, vicinity complementation, or a combination of both to improve image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If substitute nozzle complementation is used to compensate for defective nozzles, then dot omission is reduced, but stripe formation may occur due to transport errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedot formation reliabilityVSAvoidstripe formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically switches between substitute nozzle complementation and vicinity complementation based on detected transport errors. When transport errors are within acceptable ranges, substitute nozzles are used to complement defective dots. When transport errors exceed thresholds, the system transitions to using vicinity nozzles to form complementing dots, thereby adaptively preventing stripe formation while maintaining dot completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters by selecting different complementation methods based on transport error magnitudes. It adjusts the complementation strategy from substitute nozzle-based (for small errors) to vicinity nozzle-based (for large errors), effectively changing how defect compensation is performed to avoid harmful stripe artifacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If vicinity complementation is used to avoid stripe formation, then image quality improves, but dot complementation effectiveness decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestripe formationVSAvoiddot complementation effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects the appropriate complementation method based on real-time transport error detection. For small transport errors, substitute nozzle complementation is applied for effective dot recovery. For large transport errors, vicinity complementation is applied to prevent stripe formation, thereby optimally balancing both effectiveness and image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the complementation parameter (substitute vs. vicinity nozzle selection) based on transport error thresholds, ensuring that the most appropriate method is applied for each specific error condition, thus optimizing both dot complementation effectiveness and stripe prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple complementation methods are implemented to handle various error conditions, then image quality improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different complementation methods (substitute nozzle or vicinity nozzle) to different spatial and error conditions. Instead of using a single complex system for all cases, it locally adapts the complementation approach based on the specific transport error magnitude, simplifying the overall control logic while maintaining high image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter-based decision making (comparing transport error magnitudes against thresholds) to select complementation methods, avoiding the need for complex adaptive algorithms. This parameter-driven approach achieves high image quality through simple conditional logic, effectively managing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9156249B1Recording apparatus
Publication Date: 2015.10.13 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US9156249B1 patent drawing
  • US9156249B1 patent drawing
  • US9156249B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A recording apparatus includes a plurality of complementing units which form a complementing dot for complementing a dot to be formed using a defective nozzle; and a selection unit which selects any complementing unit from among the plurality of complementing units, in which the plurality of complementing units includes a substitute nozzle complementing unit which forms the complementing dot on the first raster using a substitute nozzle, without using a vicinity formation nozzle; and a combination complementing unit which forms a complementing dot on the first raster using the substitute nozzle, and on the second raster using the vicinity formation nozzle.