Inkjet Nozzle Evaluation via Erasable Test Marks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inkjet printing technologies face challenges in ensuring consistent alignment and stability of nozzles, which affects the quality of deposited materials, particularly in applications like semiconductor-based electronic devices where precise alignment and uniformity are critical.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for evaluating nozzle performance by repeatedly printing test marks on a substrate, acquiring images, and comparing them for consistency and stability, with erasable substrates and wiper systems to ensure accurate alignment and selection of suitable nozzles for printing applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If nozzles are repeatedly operated to print test marks on a substrate for evaluation, then nozzle performance can be assessed for alignment and stability, but the substrate becomes contaminated with multiple test marks requiring erasure and reuse

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenozzle performance evaluation accuracyVSAvoidsubstrate contamination with test marks
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate is used to print test marks for nozzle evaluation, then the test marks are erased using a wiper system to recover the substrate for repeated use. This allows continuous nozzle testing without discarding the substrate, resolving the contradiction between obtaining measurement data and avoiding substrate contamination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The system includes imaging and analysis components that provide feedback on nozzle performance based on the test marks printed on the substrate. This feedback mechanism enables precise evaluation of nozzle alignment and stability while the eraser system resets the substrate for continued testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Stability of the object's composition

If multiple test marks are printed on the same substrate for nozzle evaluation, then nozzle stability can be assessed over time, but the complexity of managing substrate erasure and reuse increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenozzle printing stabilityVSAvoidsubstrate erasure and reuse system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation system combines the printing head, imaging system, and wiper-based erasure system into an integrated setup. The wiper system merges the erasure function with the substrate handling process, allowing multiple test marks to be printed and erased on the same substrate without requiring separate complex subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The substrate serves its own purpose of being tested and then reset for retesting. The wiper system provides self-contained erasure capability directly at the printing location, eliminating the need for separate substrate processing equipment and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If nozzles are evaluated for alignment by printing test marks at different times, then consistent alignment can be ensured, but the time required for repeated printing and evaluation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precision of deposited linesVSAvoidtime for repeated printing and evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary printing of test marks on the substrate before final nozzle selection for production. By pre-evaluating nozzle alignment and stability through repeated test printing, the system identifies suitable nozzles in advance, ensuring manufacturing precision while reducing time loss through advance preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation process maintains continuous useful action by immediately reusing the substrate after erasure without interruption. The wiper system enables continuous cycling of test mark printing, erasure, and reprinting on the same substrate, maximizing the utility of each substrate and minimizing idle time between evaluation cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS10479122B2Printing head nozzle evaluation
Publication Date: 2019.11.19 XJET LTD
  • US10479122B2 patent drawing
  • US10479122B2 patent drawing
  • US10479122B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for evaluating performance of a plurality of nozzles of a printing head includes repeatedly operating each of the nozzles to print test marks on a surface of a substrate, each of the test marks printed by that nozzle being printed at a different time. At least once during the repeated operation of each of the nozzles, at least some of the test marks are erased from the surface. The test marks that were printed by that nozzle are inspected for a feature that is indicative of the performance of that nozzle.