Inkjet Nozzle Error Detection via Fourier Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting printing nozzle errors in inkjet printing machines are inefficient, often requiring manual intervention, leading to production downtime and paper wastage, and lack robust automatic detection capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the printing of a nozzle test pattern, digitalization using a camera, and Fourier analysis to detect amplitude, phase, and variance errors, allowing for precise identification and correction of printing nozzle issues, including alignment and positioning errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual detection and evaluation of nozzle test patterns is used, then detection capability is achieved, but production time is lost and paper wastage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenozzle error detection capabilityVSAvoidproduction downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical evaluation of nozzle test patterns with an automated optical measurement system using cameras and image processing algorithms. The system automatically captures images of printed test patterns, processes them through correlation algorithms, and identifies nozzle errors without human intervention, thereby eliminating production downtime and paper wastage associated with manual detection methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The measurement system enables the printing machine to self-diagnose nozzle errors by automatically printing test patterns, capturing images, analyzing the patterns through correlation algorithms, and generating error reports. This self-service capability eliminates the need for external manual inspection and allows immediate identification and compensation of nozzle failures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If redundancy of printing nozzles or print heads is implemented, then compensation for failed nozzles is improved, but device complexity and construction outlay increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompensation capability for failed nozzlesVSAvoidconstruction outlay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback-based error compensation system where nozzle performance is continuously monitored through automated measurement of test patterns. The system generates error reports that identify specific failed nozzles and enables compensation by adjusting the operation of adjacent nozzles or modifying printing parameters, thereby maintaining reliability without requiring redundant hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system compensates for failed nozzles by changing operational parameters rather than adding redundant components. It adjusts printing parameters such as dot size, placement position, and ink volume for affected areas, or redistributes printing tasks to adjacent functional nozzles, achieving compensation through parameter optimization instead of hardware redundancy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If precise detection of individual failed nozzles is achieved, then compensation accuracy is improved, but measurement precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracy of failed nozzlesVSAvoiddetection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces test patterns as an intermediary element that translates difficult-to-measure nozzle characteristics into easily observable printed features. These test patterns create distinct visual signatures for each nozzle group, allowing the automated system to identify failed nozzles by analyzing pattern deviations rather than directly measuring individual nozzle performance, thereby simplifying detection while maintaining precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method provides robust and automatic detection of printing nozzle errors, reducing production downtime and paper wastage by enabling precise identification and correction of nozzle issues, thereby improving print quality and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

acquiring and recording or photographing the nozzle test pattern by using at least one camera

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

carrying out a Fourier analysis by using the generated actual signal; generating a reference signal with the location frequency of the Fourier-transformed actual signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFourier transformation:

Data Source

PatentUS10589519B2Method for detecting printing nozzle errors in an inkjet printing machine
Publication Date: 2020.03.17 HEIDELBERGER DRUCKMASCHINEN AG
  • US10589519B2 patent drawing
  • US10589519B2 patent drawing
  • US10589519B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for detecting printing nozzle errors in an inkjet printing machine provides a high degree of robustness in the detection of errors by printing a nozzle test pattern in the inkjet printing machine. The test pattern is then digitalized by using a camera and transmitted to a computer for evaluation. There, the recorded test pattern is investigated by using methods of digital image processing, such as a Fourier analysis, and evaluated in the frequency range with regard to specific anticipated printing nozzle errors. Specific printing nozzle errors can be detected especially on the basis of amplitude, phase and variance errors in the signal in the frequency range. Moreover, by using the phase error, it is possible to evaluate whether the two print heads are disposed in an incorrect adjustment position relative to one another by calculating displacements of the phase error in transition regions of two print heads.