Inkjet 3D Printing Polyurethane via Segmented Reactive Components

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current additive manufacturing techniques, such as FDM and SLA, are limited by the materials they can use, particularly for printing high-temperature and chemically resistant three-dimensional objects, with polyurethane materials being unsuitable for high-resolution, contact-free inkjet printers due to their semi-rigid nature and solvent requirements.

Innovation Solution

The development of systems and methods for inkjet-based three-dimensional printing using a multi-part formulation of polyurethane, where printheads and nozzles eject reactive components with controlled molar ratios and patterns to achieve solidification and maximize surface interaction, allowing for the creation of a wide range of polyurethane materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If polyurethane is diluted with solvents at a low solid-to-solvent ratio to enable inkjet printing, then the material can be printed using inkjet technology, but it becomes infeasible to print three-dimensional and large structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinkjet printing capabilityVSAvoidthree-dimensional structure accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The polyurethane material is divided into multiple separate components (isocyanate and polyol) that are stored and deposited separately by different printheads. These components are then mixed in situ at the deposition site, allowing the material to maintain high solid content without premature reaction or solvent dilution, enabling accurate 3D structure printing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If multi-part polyurethane formulations are used to achieve solidification, then solid three-dimensional objects can be formed, but precise control over molar ratios and reaction rates is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolid object formationVSAvoidformulation and deposition control
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback control mechanisms where the deposition parameters of each printhead are dynamically adjusted based on real-time monitoring of the reaction progress and material properties. This ensures precise maintenance of stoichiometric ratios and optimal reaction rates throughout the printing process, achieving accurate solid object formation while managing formulation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If reactive components are ejected with controlled molar ratios to maximize surface interaction, then solidification is achieved, but the system requires multiple printheads and nozzles for different parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolidification controlVSAvoidmultiple printheads and nozzles
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple printheads and nozzles for different polyurethane components are integrated into a single coordinated printing system. The printheads are positioned and synchronized to deposit different components in precise patterns that maximize surface interaction area, achieving effective solidification while managing system complexity through unified control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the efficient fabrication of highly accurate, solid three-dimensional polyurethane objects with enhanced mechanical properties, overcoming the limitations of existing technologies by achieving precise control over material deposition and reaction rates.

Implementation Method 1

The first fluid includes a first material and the second fluid includes a second material, with the second material being configured to react with the first material to form a printed material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS11097464B2Systems, devices, and methods for inkjet-based three-dimensional printing
Publication Date: 2021.08.24 MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH
  • US11097464B2 patent drawing
  • US11097464B2 patent drawing
  • US11097464B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Devices and methods are described that provide printing of three-dimensional objects using reactive materials such as materials that result in a polyurethane formulation. Three-dimensional printing in accordance with the present disclosure can be performed using an inkjet printer or other systems that deposit or dispense material. A formulation made up of two or more reactive materials and, optionally, one or more UV-curable materials is also provided. The materials can be jetted based on a desired configuration to achieve a maximum reaction between materials, and can be based on desired jetting or molar ratios. By heating or applying energy on the jetted materials, their reaction and related solidifying can be accelerated. Corrective printing is also provided for, and can be used at desired intervals to eliminate printing errors relative to the object as modeled. Systems and methods used in conjunction with all of the same are provided.