Inkjet Recording Apparatus Refeeder Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing inkjet recording apparatuses face issues with jamming and ink leakage soiling the recording medium during dual-sided printing, as the refeed path's small radius of curvature increases jamming chances and ink leakage contaminates the sheet.

Innovation Solution

The inkjet recording apparatus design positions the ink reservoir below the refeeder, preventing ink from soiling the sheet and increasing the sheet's radius of curvature during refeeding, thus reducing jamming risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the refeed path is provided between the conveyor and the paper feeder, then dual-sided recording is enabled, but the sheet has to be turned over at a small radius of curvature which increases the chance of jamming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedual-sided recording capabilityVSAvoidjamming risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent repositions the refeed path from a horizontal arrangement (between conveyor and paper feeder) to a vertical arrangement (below the ink containers). This dimensional change allows the sheet to be turned over with a larger radius of curvature, reducing jamming risk while maintaining dual-sided recording capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If the refeed path is provided below the ink containers, then space is optimized, but if ink leaks from an ink container, the leaking ink soils the refeed path and is transferred to a sheet

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural arrangementVSAvoidink leakage soiling
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional arrangement by placing the ink containers below the refeed path instead of above it. This reversal ensures that any ink leakage falls away from the refeed path and recorded sheets, preventing soil contamination while maintaining compact structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Device complexity

If the refeeder is disposed above the recording medium feeder, then compact design is achieved, but the radius of curvature of a recording medium turned over in the refeeder is small which increases jamming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompact designVSAvoidjamming probability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions the refeeder from a horizontally compact arrangement (above the feeder) to a vertically extended arrangement (below the ink containers). This vertical positioning provides adequate space for the sheet to turn over with a larger radius of curvature, reducing jamming while maintaining overall compactness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP2082886B1Inkjet recording apparatus
Publication Date: 2014.05.14 BROTHER KOGYO KK
  • EP2082886B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2082886B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2082886B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An inkjet recording apparatus includes: an ink ejection head having ink ejection openings; a conveyance mechanism which is disposed below the ink ejection head and conveys a recording medium facing the ink ejection openings; a recording medium feeder which is disposed below the conveyance mechanism, is capable of stocking therein a recording medium, and feeds a recording medium to the conveyance mechanism; a refeeder which is partially disposed below the recording medium feeder and which refeeds, to the conveyance mechanism, a recording medium having conveyed by the conveyance mechanism; and an ink reservoir which is disposed below the refeeder and reserves therein ink to be fed to the ink ejection head.