Inkjet Recording Device With Temperature-Adaptive Bubble Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The generation of bubbles in inkjet recording devices due to temperature changes affects the ejection performance of the recording head, necessitating effective countermeasures to maintain ink quality and prevent nozzle clogging.

Innovation Solution

An inkjet recording apparatus with a circulation degassing system that circulates ink through a separate flow path, using a non-positive displacement pump to reduce pressure and replace ink layers to enhance degassing efficiency, combined with a control device to adjust bubble countermeasures based on calculated bubble generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If the ink temperature increases, then the ejection performance may improve, but the amount of bubble generation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveink temperatureVSAvoidbubble generation
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of temperature increase (which causes bubble generation) into a beneficial degassing process. By intentionally heating the ink in a controlled manner and simultaneously applying reduced pressure, the system promotes bubble formation and removal, thereby eliminating dissolved gases that would otherwise cause ejection failures. The harmful thermal effect is transformed into a useful degassing mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by performing degassing treatment before the ink is supplied to the recording head. The system proactively removes bubbles from the ink by creating conditions that promote bubble formation and separation (heating and pressure reduction) before the ink reaches the ejection nozzles. This preventive approach ensures that bubbles are eliminated in advance, preventing ejection failures during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Reliability

If a stirrer is rotated by magnetic force to stir the ink, then the degassing effect is enhanced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedegassing efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the magnetic stirrer mechanism with a simpler pressure control system. Instead of using magnetic fields to rotate a stirrer and mechanically agitate the ink, the system uses pressure reduction to promote natural convection and bubble separation. This substitution eliminates the need for complex magnetic drive mechanisms while achieving effective degassing through pressure-controlled fluid dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the essential function of degassing from the complex magnetic stirrer system and achieves it through a simpler pressure control mechanism. By removing the magnetic stirrer components and relying on pressure-induced convection and bubble separation, the system maintains degassing effectiveness while significantly reducing device complexity and eliminating unnecessary mechanical parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If bubble countermeasure treatment is strengthened, then the ejection performance is maintained, but the loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejection performanceVSAvoidcountermeasure execution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary degassing action by removing bubbles from the ink before it is supplied to the recording head. The degassing process is completed in advance during ink circulation or storage, ensuring that the ink reaches the ejection nozzles in a bubble-free state. This preliminary action eliminates the need for time-consuming bubble countermeasures during actual printing operations, maintaining ejection performance without time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous degassing action by maintaining pressure control and circulation throughout the ink supply system. Instead of performing intermittent bubble removal operations that consume time, the system continuously prevents bubble formation and promotes bubble separation through sustained pressure management. This continuous action ensures consistent ejection performance without interrupting the printing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively manages bubble generation by adjusting operations according to temperature-induced changes, maintaining ink quality and preventing nozzle clogging, thus ensuring consistent ejection performance.

Implementation Method 1

using a non-positive displacement pump to reduce pressure and replace ink layers to enhance degassing efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure reduction: Depressurisation

Implementation Method 2

Since an amount of saturated dissolved gas in the ink depends on a temperature of the ink, an amount of bubbles generated from the ink is determined by the temperature change of the ink

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature-dependent gas solubility: Temperature Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP4624177A1Inkjet recording device
Publication Date: 2025.10.01 KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC
  • EP4624177A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4624177A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4624177A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An inkjet recording apparatus (1) includes a recording head (21) which ejects a liquid; a bubble countermeasure means for executing a bubble countermeasure treatment determined as a countermeasure against bubbles generated in the liquid; a bubble generation amount calculation means for calculating an amount of bubbles generated from the liquid; and a control device (38) which strengthens the bubble countermeasure treatment when the amount of bubble generation calculated by the bubble generation amount calculation means is larger than a predetermined amount.