Inkjet Printhead Waveform Timing to Reduce Nozzle Cross-Talk

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Continuous inkjet printing technologies face challenges in preventing the formation of print artifacts under certain conditions, which affect print quality and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The method involves segmenting the nozzle array into interleaved groups with phase-shifted and energy-modulated drop-formation waveforms, using a timing delay device to synchronize drop break-off times and electrostatic deflection, allowing for effective separation of printing and non-printing drops using a common charging electrode.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a common charging electrode is used for both nozzle groups, then device complexity is reduced, but cross-talk artifacts occur due to unsynchronized drop break-off times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging electrode configurationVSAvoidprint quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The nozzle array is segmented into two interleaved groups (first group and second group) that are controlled by separate waveform sequences with different phases. This segmentation allows independent timing control of drop formation in each group, enabling synchronization with the common charging electrode waveform to prevent cross-talk artifacts while maintaining device simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic charging electrode waveforms with specific phases that correspond to the periodic drop formation waveforms. By applying periodic actions with carefully controlled phase relationships, drops from both nozzle groups break off at synchronized times during specific phases of the charging waveform, eliminating cross-talk while using a single charging electrode

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Productivity

If drop formation waveforms are applied to all nozzles simultaneously, then productivity is maintained, but cross-talk artifacts are produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting speedVSAvoidprint quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic drop formation waveforms with carefully controlled phase differences between the two nozzle groups. The phase-shifted periodic waveforms ensure that drops from different nozzle groups break off at different times within the periodic cycle, synchronizing with the charging electrode phases to prevent cross-talk while maintaining high-speed continuous printing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the timing parameter (phase) of the drop formation waveforms for the two nozzle groups relative to each other and to the charging electrode waveform. By adjusting these phase parameters, the drop break-off times are synchronized with the appropriate phases of the charging waveform, eliminating cross-talk artifacts while preserving printing speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces cross-talk artifacts and enhances print quality by synchronizing drop break-off times and energies, ensuring accurate deflection and reduced formation of diffuse ink spots, thereby improving print resolution and consistency.

Implementation Method 1

a drop formation device associated with each of the plurality of nozzles... modulate the liquid jet ejected from the particular nozzle to selectively cause portions of the liquid jet to break off into a pair of drops

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic cavitation: Acoustic Cavitation

Implementation Method 2

drop formation device... modulate the liquid jet ejected from the particular nozzle to selectively cause portions of the liquid jet to break off

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic vibration: Ultrasonic Vibration

Implementation Method 3

providing a charging device including: a common charging electrode positioned in proximity to the liquid jets ejected through both the first and second groups of nozzles... providing a varying electrical potential between the charging electrode and the liquid jets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic induction: Electrostatic Induction

Implementation Method 4

providing a deflection device which causes the printing drops having the first printing-drop charge state to travel along a different path from the non-printing drops having the second non-printing-drop charge state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentEP3720718B1Controlling waveforms to reduce nozzle cross-talk
Publication Date: 2023.01.11 EASTMAN KODAK CO
  • EP3720718B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3720718B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3720718B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An inkjet printhead includes two groups of interleaved nozzles. First and second sets of drop-formation waveforms are associated with the groups of nozzles to selectively cause portions of a liquid jet to break off into drops. A timing delay device time-shifts the second-group waveforms relative to those associated with the first-group waveforms. A charging-electrode waveform having portions with first and second potentials is provided to a charging electrode. The waveform energies of the second-group waveforms is larger than the waveform energies of the corresponding first-group waveforms so that printing drops break off from the liquid jets while the charging-electrode is at the first potential, and non-printing drops break off from the liquid jets while the charging-electrode is at the second potential.