Inkjet Ejection Head Wiper Segmented Cleaning
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Ejection failures occur in recording heads due to ink accumulation in recessed portions during wiping operations, as existing methods either fail to fully clean the ejection port surface or cause ink droplets to remain, leading to incomplete cleaning and potential ejection issues.
Innovation Solution
An ejection apparatus with a wiper system that performs a first wiping operation with a closer distance and a second operation with a greater distance from the ejection port surface, ensuring thorough cleaning while preventing ink droplet removal from recessed portions, and includes a heating recovery step to evaporate remaining ink droplets.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Manufacturing precision
If the ejection port surface is wiped with strong wiping conditions to fully clean the surface, then the cleaning effectiveness is improved, but ink droplets are drawn out of the recessed portion and remain on the ejection port surface causing ejection failure
Solution Approach 1:
The wiping operation is divided into two distinct phases: a first wiping operation with stronger wiping conditions to clean the ejection port surface, and a second wiping operation with weaker wiping conditions to prevent ink droplets from being drawn out of the recessed portion. This segmentation allows each phase to address specific cleaning needs without causing harmful effects.
Solution Approach 2:
The first wiping operation is performed as a preliminary action to remove accumulated ink from the ejection port surface before the second wiping operation. By performing this initial cleaning with stronger conditions first, the subsequent weaker wiping can focus on preventing ink droplet extrusion without compromising overall cleaning effectiveness.
2Reliability
If the ejection port surface is wiped with weak wiping conditions to prevent ink droplets from being drawn out, then the ejection success rate is improved, but the ejection port surface may not be fully cleaned
Solution Approach 1:
The wiping operation is divided into two distinct phases: a first wiping operation with stronger wiping conditions to clean the ejection port surface, and a second wiping operation with weaker wiping conditions to prevent ink droplets from being drawn out of the recessed portion. This segmentation allows each phase to address specific cleaning needs without causing harmful effects.
Solution Approach 2:
The first wiping operation is performed as a preliminary action to remove accumulated ink from the ejection port surface before the second wiping operation. By performing this initial cleaning with stronger conditions first, the subsequent weaker wiping can focus on preventing ink droplet extrusion without compromising overall cleaning effectiveness.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
Prevents ejection failures by ensuring a fully cleaned ejection port surface and reducing the number of ink droplets left behind, thereby maintaining effective inkjet recording performance.
Implementation Method 1
a wiper configured to wipe the ejection port surface... the wiper performs a wiping operation for wiping the ejection head to wipe the ejection port
Implementation Method 2
a heating unit configured to heat the ejection port surface in a state where the ejection port surface and the installation unit are at the third distance
Data Source
AI summary
An ejection apparatus includes an ejection head, and a recessed portion, a wiper, an installation unit, and a moving unit configured to move the blade and the ejection head relative to each other, wherein the wiper performs a wiping operation for wiping the ejection head to wipe the ejection port after wiping the recessed portion, and wherein in the wiping operation, a first wiping operation is performed in a state where the ejection port surface and the installation unit on which the wiper is installed are at a first distance in a direction perpendicular to the ejection port surface, and a second wiping operation is performed in a state where the ejection port surface and the installation unit on which the wiper is installed are at a second distance in the direction perpendicular to the ejection port surface, the second distance being larger than the first distance.


