Inland Barrier Crossing Validation Using Probe Velocity Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods lack an effective way to analyze probe measurements to determine whether an inland water barrier crossing is a bridge, ferry, or tunnel, leading to inaccurate digital map data and poor navigation decisions.

Innovation Solution

A method that evaluates probe data velocity across inland water barriers to establish a crossing speed threshold, inferring the type of crossing based on whether the average velocity exceeds or falls below this threshold, allowing for accurate designation of bridges, ferries, or tunnels in digital maps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If probe measurements are collected and analyzed to determine inland barrier crossing types, then digital map accuracy is improved, but the complexity of data analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedigital map accuracyVSAvoiddata analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the complex qualitative problem of barrier type identification into a quantitative parameter-based solution. By calculating average velocity from probe measurements and comparing it against predefined thresholds, the system automatically determines whether a barrier is a bridge or ferry without requiring complex analytical methods. This parameter transformation resolves the contradiction by maintaining high accuracy through systematic velocity analysis while avoiding excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables digital maps to self-validate and self-update by automatically analyzing probe measurement data. The automated velocity-based classification process allows the map database to correct its own inaccuracies without manual intervention, improving measurement precision while keeping the analysis process manageable through rule-based automation rather than complex algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual validation of barrier crossings is performed, then data accuracy is maintained, but the time and resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidvalidation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an automated self-validation system that processes probe measurements and determines barrier types without manual intervention. The system automatically calculates velocities, applies threshold comparisons, and updates digital map data, thereby maintaining high reliability while eliminating the time loss associated with manual validation processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual validation process with an automated computational system. Instead of human editors manually analyzing barrier crossings, the system uses velocity calculations and algorithmic threshold comparisons to automatically determine barrier types, significantly reducing validation time while maintaining or improving data accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If velocity threshold analysis is used to identify barrier types, then the complexity of analysis is reduced, but the precision of classification may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis complexityVSAvoidclassification precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent carefully selects and optimizes velocity threshold parameters to maintain classification precision while keeping analysis simple. By establishing specific threshold values that distinguish bridge velocities from ferry velocities, the system achieves accurate barrier type classification through straightforward velocity comparison, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and precision through well-chosen parameter values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2585793B1Method for validating inland barrier crossing in a digital map
Publication Date: 2019.12.18 TOMTOM GLOBAL CONTENT
  • EP2585793B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2585793B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2585793B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A method for detecting inland barrier (16, 16') crossings (24, 26, 30) using speed layers from community input probe traces in combination with a digital map. Inland barrier crossing specifications are detected and/or validated using information about the speed of probes that actually cross the barrier (16, 16'). A bridge (26) across the inland barrier (16) is inferred if the velocity average for barrier crossing probe traces is greater than an established threshold value. Conversely, a ferry (24) is inferred if the average velocity for barrier crossing probe traces is less than the established threshold value. When there is a prominent gap in the data for the barrier crossing probe traces, a tunnel (30) is inferred.