Inlet Coverage Prediction Using CFD Surrogate Flow Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques for assessing flow source coverage in industrial simulations are complex, time-consuming, and require manual post-processing, leading to inefficiencies and incomplete coverage analysis in large or complex geometries.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system and method using machine learning surrogate models, specifically deep learning (DL) models, to predict and visualize the coverage of input flow sources in a simulation environment, optimizing the design process with real-time, immersive collaboration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional CFD simulation methods are used to assess flow source coverage, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to extremely long simulation times ranging from hours to months

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow source coverage assessment accuracyVSAvoidsimulation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital twin (virtual copy) of the physical flow field environment. This digital twin replicates the complex CFD simulation capabilities but runs much faster, enabling rapid assessment of flow source coverage without requiring hours or months of traditional simulation time. The digital twin is trained on CFD data and can predict flow patterns, coverage metrics, and optimization opportunities in real-time or near-real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing the complex CFD simulation data to train the digital twin model beforehand. Once trained, the digital twin can instantly provide coverage assessments without requiring full CFD simulations each time. This preliminary preparation enables rapid iterative design optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If manual post-processing steps are used to identify coverage of inlets, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to repetitive manual analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage analysis accuracyVSAvoidpost-processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The digital twin system performs self-service by automatically analyzing flow field data, identifying coverage patterns, and generating optimization recommendations without requiring manual post-processing. The system autonomously processes simulation data, calculates coverage metrics for multiple inlets, and provides actionable insights, eliminating the repetitive manual analysis step while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If the number of streamlines or particles is increased to cover the entire simulation domain, then measurement precision is improved, but use of energy increases to computationally prohibitive levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow field coverage completenessVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of increasing the number of streamlines or particles in traditional CFD simulations (which exponentially increases computational energy consumption), the patent uses a digital twin that has already learned flow patterns from training data. The digital twin can assess complete domain coverage with minimal computational resources, effectively copying the results of high-resolution simulations without the associated energy cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If multiple iterations are performed to decide number of streamlines/particles and injection points, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to iterative optimization requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow source coverage accuracyVSAvoiditerative optimization time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The digital twin system incorporates feedback mechanisms that automatically analyze coverage results and provide optimization recommendations. Instead of requiring multiple manual iterations to adjust streamline/particle numbers and injection points, the system uses feedback loops to automatically refine parameters, assess coverage improvements, and converge on optimal configurations much faster than traditional iterative approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4703948A1System and method to assess coverage of input flow sources in an industrial metaverse environment
Publication Date: 2026.03.04 SIEMENS AG
  • EP4703948A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4703948A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4703948A1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3C

AI summary

A computer-implemented method (500) to assess the coverage of input flow sources in a simulation environment is disclosed. The method (500) comprises generating, (502) flow vectors across plurality of surfaces of the simulation environment associated with predefined parameters. Further, the method (500) comprises running, (504) a flow of the fluid to simulate the flowing rates of the fluid within the simulation environment to define passive scalar functions for each zone of influence of each of a plurality of inlets within the simulation environment. Further, the method (500) comprises predicting, (506) coverage of the plurality of inlets based on simulated flowing rates of the fluid and defined passive scalar functions for each zone of influence of the plurality of inlets within the simulation environment. Further, the method (500) comprises plotting, (508) a coverage function to visualize each zone of influence of each of the plurality of inlets based on the predicted coverage.