Inlet Particle Separator Hub Suction Flow Passage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional inlet particle separators for aeronautical vehicle engines are inefficient in separating small particles (<80 microns) from engine inlet air, leading to potential engine performance degradation due to particle ingestion, without significantly increasing core pressure loss.

Innovation Solution

The proposed inlet particle separator system incorporates a hub section, shroud section, and splitter with hub or shroud suction flow passages to enhance separation efficiency by directing small particles into a scavenge flow path, utilizing a configuration that includes a main flow passageway with an air inlet and a splitter to divide the flow into engine and scavenge paths, and optionally features hub or shroud suction flow passages with inlet and outlet ports to further separate particles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional inlet particle separator is used, then large particles (>80 microns) are separated efficiently, but small particles (<80 microns) are not separated effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle separation efficiencyVSAvoidengine performance reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The separator is divided into multiple functional zones: a primary separation zone for large particles and a secondary hub suction zone for small particles. The splitter divides the flow path into engine flow and scavenge flow, while the hub suction flow passage creates a separate suction zone to capture fine particles that would otherwise escape through the engine inlet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hub suction flow passage acts as an intermediary mechanism between the main flow and the scavenge system. It creates a secondary suction path that intercepts small particles before they reach the engine inlet, using a hub suction inlet port and outlet port configuration to draw fine particles into the scavenge flow path for removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If particle separation efficiency is increased, then more particles are removed from air, but core pressure loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle separation efficiencyVSAvoidcore pressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The separator applies different flow control characteristics to different zones: the main flow passageway maintains smooth flow for engine air, while the hub suction flow passage creates localized suction zones to capture particles. The splitter geometry is optimized to direct particle-laden flow to the scavenge path while maintaining efficient engine air flow through the hub and shroud sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes flow parameters locally by creating suction zones through the hub suction inlet port and shroud suction inlet port. These suction ports create pressure differentials that enhance particle capture without requiring a complete redesign of the main flow path, thereby improving separation efficiency while minimizing overall pressure loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration increases the separation efficiency of small particles from engine inlet air without significantly increasing core pressure loss, ensuring cleaner air is directed into the engine and reducing the risk of engine performance degradation.

Implementation Method 1

The inertia of relatively larger ones of the suspended particles tends to cause these particles to travel in a straight line rather than follow the fluid passageway. Because of the manner in which the inlet particle separator is configured, most of the suspended particles tend to flow into the scavenge flow path rather curve into the engine flow path.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia: Inertia

Implementation Method 2

The hub suction flow passage has a hub suction inlet port and a hub suction outlet port. The hub suction inlet port extends through the hub section and is in fluid communication with the air inlet. The hub suction outlet port extends through the splitter and is in fluid communication with the scavenge flow path.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Data Source

PatentUS9394827B2Inlet particle separator system with flow passage through hub and/or shroud
Publication Date: 2016.07.19 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US9394827B2 patent drawing
  • US9394827B2 patent drawing
  • US9394827B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inlet particle separator system for a vehicle engine includes a hub section, a shroud section, a splitter, and a hub suction flow passage. The shroud section surrounds at least a portion of the hub section and is spaced apart therefrom to define a main flow passageway that has an air inlet. The splitter is disposed downstream of the air inlet and extends into the passageway to divide the main flow passageway into a scavenge flow path and an engine flow path. The hub suction flow passage has a hub suction inlet port and a hub suction outlet port. The hub suction inlet port extends through the hub section and is in fluid communication with the air inlet. The hub suction outlet port extends through the splitter and is in fluid communication with the scavenge flow path.