In-Line Air Separator for Eductor Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional eductor systems fail to separate water from entrained air downstream, leading to increased hydraulic force and the need for additional equipment like holding tanks to manage the air-liquid mixture.

Innovation Solution

An in-line two-phase separator is integrated downstream of the eductor, utilizing changes in velocity and pressure, along with internal baffles, to separate air from water, thereby eliminating the need for a separate fluid discharge tank.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional eductor systems are used without air separation, then the system structure is simple, but air-entrained water exits with increased hydraulic force requiring additional equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidhydraulic force
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes air from the water stream using a separator device positioned downstream of the eductor. The separator isolates the air separation function from the mixing function, allowing air to be removed while water continues to the discharge point, thereby reducing hydraulic force without complicating the eductor itself

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The separator acts as an intermediary device between the eductor and the discharge point. It mediates the air-entrained water stream by separating the air phase from the liquid phase, allowing the water to be discharged with reduced hydraulic force while the air is vented separately

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If air is not separated from water downstream, then no additional equipment is needed, but holding tanks are required to manage air-liquid mixture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment quantityVSAvoidoperational management
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The separator extracts air from the water stream, eliminating the need for holding tanks that would otherwise be required to manage air-liquid mixtures. By removing air at the point of separation, the system avoids the operational complexity of managing air pockets in holding tanks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Force

If in-line separator is integrated downstream, then air is effectively removed reducing hydraulic force, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydraulic forceVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The separator utilizes pneumatic and hydraulic principles to separate air from water. By exploiting the density difference between air and water, the device uses flow dynamics and pressure changes to achieve separation without mechanical moving parts, reducing complexity while effectively reducing hydraulic force

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The separator changes physical parameters of the flowing stream, including velocity, pressure, and flow direction, to facilitate air-water separation. These parameter changes occur naturally through the separator's geometry, allowing effective air removal without adding complex control mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The in-line separator effectively removes entrained air, reducing hydraulic force and allowing direct discharge into a pump suction or mixing tank, thereby reducing space requirements, operational power, and maintenance needs.

Implementation Method 1

utilizing changes in velocity and pressure, along with internal baffles, to separate air from water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure Gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

An in-line two-phase separator is integrated downstream of the eductor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTwo-Phase Flow: Two-Phase Flow

Implementation Method 3

The accelerated water flow in the venturi section creates a vacuum due to the principle of the Venturi effect. The vacuum created by the venturi effect pulls the powder into the eductor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVenturi effect: Venturi Effect

Implementation Method 4

the entrained air travels with the water powder mixture to the discharge outlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Data Source

PatentUS20250121308A1In-line air separator and fluid deceleration method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.04.17 DOWNHOLE CHEMICAL SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US20250121308A1 patent drawing
  • US20250121308A1 patent drawing
  • US20250121308A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A gas-liquid separator is described, for use in sequence with an eductor or other mechanism for mixing dry chemicals into a carrier fluid such as water, where such mechanisms often entrain air into the fluid. The separator comprises an inlet port directing fluid towards a turbulent zone (created by an internal baffle with at least one gap at the bottom). The gas and liquid are separated in the turbulent zone, and collected by outlets positioned above and below the gap in the baffle, respectively.