In-line Mixer Impeller Design for Paint Mixing Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional in-line mixers for paint manufacturing suffer from inefficiencies due to dead volume in the mixing chamber, which reduces productivity and mixing efficiency, as the impeller occupies a small portion of the chamber volume, leading to regions with little or no turbulence, and the introduction of dead volume fillers further reduces usable volume and mixing effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

A modular in-line mixer with an impeller designed to fit the mixing chamber surface, featuring a circular disk and caps with rotationally symmetrical mixing blades, eliminating the need for dead volume fillers by ensuring the impeller covers a substantial portion of the chamber, thereby increasing turbulence and mixing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a conventional impeller design is used in the mixing chamber, then the device complexity is reduced, but the mixing efficiency deteriorates due to dead volume formation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpeller structure simplicityVSAvoidmixing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The impeller design incorporates dynamic elements including multiple mixing blades positioned at different angles and heights, creating variable turbulence patterns throughout the mixing chamber. The blades are configured to generate different flow patterns at various radial positions, ensuring comprehensive fluid mixing while eliminating dead volume regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The impeller extends in multiple spatial dimensions with blades positioned at different radial distances, axial heights, and angular orientations from the central shaft. This three-dimensional blade arrangement ensures that mixing action penetrates throughout the entire mixing chamber volume, eliminating dead zones while maintaining structural efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If dead volume fillers are introduced into the mixing chamber, then the mixing efficiency is improved, but the usable volume is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing efficiencyVSAvoidusable mixing chamber volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the need for dead volume fillers by redesigning the impeller geometry. The improved impeller design directly addresses dead volume formation through optimized blade positioning and configuration, removing the requirement for additional filler structures and thereby preserving the full usable volume of the mixing chamber.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The impeller design modifies key geometric parameters including blade angle, blade height, radial positioning, and spacing between blades. These parameter changes optimize the impeller's ability to eliminate dead volume while maintaining or increasing the usable mixing chamber volume, achieving efficient mixing without volumetric compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If the impeller occupies a small portion of the mixing chamber volume, then the device complexity is reduced, but the turbulence generation is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpeller chamber ratioVSAvoidturbulence generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The impeller generates dynamic turbulence through multiple blades positioned at varying angles and heights, creating complex fluid motion patterns. The blades are designed to induce both radial and axial flow components, generating sufficient turbulence throughout the mixing chamber while maintaining a compact impeller-to-chamber volume ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The impeller design creates mechanical turbulence through the rotational motion of multiple blades cutting through the fluid. The blade configuration generates controlled turbulence and eddies that enhance mixing efficiency, achieving adequate turbulence generation with an impeller that occupies a reasonable portion of the mixing chamber volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The modular mixer design enhances mixing efficiency by eliminating dead volume, allowing for the efficient mixing of more components and improving productivity by ensuring that the impeller covers a significant portion of the mixing chamber, resulting in improved turbulence and increased capacity without the need for dead volume fillers.

Implementation Method 1

The conveyed ingredients or components are then agitated by an impeller within a mixing chamber of the mixer... certain regions of the mixing chamber generate little or no turbulence even when the impeller is at high speed of rotation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentUS8469585B2In-line multi-chamber mixer
Publication Date: 2013.06.25 AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS IP CO LLC
  • US8469585B2 patent drawing
  • US8469585B2 patent drawing
  • US8469585B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is directed to an in-line mixer for mixing a plurality of fluids to produce a mixed product. The mixer includes one or more mixing chambers, an impeller in each of the mixing chambers, one or more inlets coupled to injection valves for conveying the fluids into the mixing chamber, and an outlet for conveying the mixed product out of the mixing chamber. The in-line mixer is well suited to components, such as those used in making automotive OEM and refinish paints.