Inline Shock Absorber Suspension for Cycle Wheel Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Telescopic front suspension forks for two-wheeled vehicles face issues such as high stiction, reduced stability due to mechanical trail reduction during compression, lack of leverage ratio, and undesirable braking reactions, which affect handling and traction.

Innovation Solution

A suspension assembly with a steering fork, shock link, shock absorber in an inline configuration, coil spring, and control link, arranged in a trailing configuration to increase mechanical trail distance during compression, providing a greater than 1:1 leverage ratio and improved stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If telescopic fork architecture is used, then suspension compression is achieved, but mechanical trail reduces causing instability

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidmechanical trail
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional telescopic fork architecture by using a shock absorber with inline configuration where the coil spring and damper are arranged in series along the same axis. This inversion allows the suspension to compress while maintaining or increasing mechanical trail, thereby improving stability during compression rather than reducing it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary linkage system between the wheel and the shock absorber. This linkage mechanism mediates the relationship between wheel movement and shock absorber compression, enabling the suspension to compress while maintaining mechanical trail through the intermediate mechanical connection rather than direct attachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If large diameter stantions are used to support fore/aft loads, then structural support is improved, but stiction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidstiction
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the large diameter stantion structure from the design, eliminating the need for oversized structural components. By using the inline shock absorber configuration with proper linkage, the system achieves adequate structural support with smaller components, thereby reducing the sliding surfaces and seals that generate stiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional telescopic fork mechanical system with an inline shock absorber and linkage system. This substitution eliminates the need for large stantions with multiple sliding surfaces, reducing mechanical friction and stiction while maintaining structural support capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Force

If bushings are enlarged to support higher loads, then load bearing capacity is improved, but stiction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload bearing capacityVSAvoidstiction
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the need for large bushings by replacing the telescopic fork architecture with an inline shock absorber system. The linkage mechanism distributes loads differently, allowing smaller bushings with reduced sliding surfaces that generate less stiction while maintaining adequate load bearing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If telescopic fork compresses linearly, then simple compression is achieved, but leverage ratio is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression simplicityVSAvoidleverage ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic leverage ratio characteristics through the linkage system. As the suspension compresses, the leverage ratio between wheel travel and shock absorber compression changes dynamically rather than remaining constant. This provides mechanical advantage and improved comfort while maintaining operational simplicity through the automated mechanical linkage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution reduces stiction, increases stability during braking and cornering, and enhances traction by maintaining or increasing mechanical trail distance as the suspension compresses, unlike traditional telescopic forks.

Implementation Method 1

coil spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

shock absorber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamping: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS10549813B2Inline shock absorber with coil spring for a cycle wheel suspension assembly
Publication Date: 2020.02.04 SPECIALIZED BICYCLE COMPONENTS INC
  • US10549813B2 patent drawing
  • US10549813B2 patent drawing
  • US10549813B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A trailing link, multi-link suspension assembly for a cycle having improved stability includes a first arm having a first arm fixed pivot and a first arm shock pivot. A shock link has a shock link fixed pivot and a shock link floating pivot. A shock absorber has an inline configuration, a coil spring, a first shock mount and a second shock mount. A wheel carrier has a wheel carrier first pivot and a wheel carrier second pivot spaced apart from one another, and a wheel mount that is adapted to be connected to a wheel. A control link has a control link floating pivot and a control link fixed pivot, the control link floating pivot being pivotably connected to the wheel carrier second pivot, and the control link fixed pivot being pivotably connected to the first arm control pivot. A mechanical trail distance increases as the suspension assembly compresses relative to a fully extended state.