In-Line Shoulder Joint Layout for Single-Port Robotic Surgery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current robotic surgical systems face challenges such as high cost, large size, complex operation, and the need for extensive training, while minimally invasive laparoscopic techniques suffer from increased surgery duration, reduced visibility, and dexterity requirements, with single-port entry systems like GelPort and Da Vinci having limitations in accessibility and affordability.

Innovation Solution

A single-armed robotic device with a compact in-line shoulder joint design, featuring nested driveshafts and a differential yoke, allowing insertion through standard trocar ports, and a modular design for minimal invasiveness and ease of use, reducing complexity and cost.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If traditional robotic surgical systems like Da Vinci are used, then surgical precision and automation are improved, but device size, cost, and operational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical automationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system is divided into separate functional modules: a control console for automation operations and a standalone robotic arm for surgical execution. This segmentation allows the complex automated control functions to be isolated from the surgical instrument, reducing the complexity of the device inserted into the patient while maintaining high-level automation capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control and processing components are extracted from the robotic arm itself and placed in an external console. The robotic arm contains only the essential surgical tools and actuation mechanisms, removing unnecessary complexity from the minimally invasive portion while preserving automated surgical precision through the external control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Length of moving object

If single-port entry systems are used, then incision size is reduced, but accessibility and dexterity are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincision sizeVSAvoidsurgical accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple driveshafts and mechanical components are nested within each other in a compact arrangement. The first and second driveshafts are positioned concentrically, with additional components nested within the arm structure, allowing the robotic system to fit through a single small port while maintaining the mechanical complexity needed for surgical dexterity and accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic arm utilizes three-dimensional spatial arrangement of components, with driveshafts arranged in concentric circles and mechanical elements positioned in multiple layers. This dimensional optimization allows compact packaging of functional components to fit through a single port while maintaining full surgical capability through clever spatial design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Volume of moving object

If compact robotic arms are designed, then device size and cost are reduced, but maintaining surgical precision and dexterity becomes challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobotic arm sizeVSAvoidsurgical precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic arm employs nested driveshafts where the first driveshaft and second driveshaft are positioned concentrically within each other. This nesting arrangement minimizes the radial space required while maintaining the mechanical linkages necessary for precise surgical movements, achieving compact size without sacrificing manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the spatial parameters of the mechanical components, arranging driveshafts in concentric circular patterns rather than linear arrangements. This parameter optimization allows the same functional precision to be achieved in a more compact volume by optimizing the geometric configuration of the mechanical elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250275819A1Single-arm robotic device with compact joint design and related systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 BOARD OF RGT UNIV OF NEBRASKA
  • US20250275819A1 patent drawing
  • US20250275819A1 patent drawing
  • US20250275819A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are various robotic surgical devices and systems that include first and second elongate bodies, first and second driveshafts disposed through the second elongate body, and an in-line shoulder joint with a robotic arm coupled thereto. In certain implementations, the in-line shoulder joint has a differential yoke and a dual shaft disposed within the yoke lumen.