In-line PAN Precursor Spinning for Carbon Fiber Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The traditional two-step process for manufacturing carbon fibers is inefficient due to incompatibility in speed and flow rate parameters, leading to uneven oxidation, high costs, and limited flexibility in producing low-denier tows, with the need for bobbin winding and separate plants for each step.

Innovation Solution

A single in-line process where the PAN precursor fiber is directly supplied to the carbonization section, using low output-speed spinning with modular modules arranged to minimize crosswise deviations and allow for flexible production of low-denier tows, eliminating the need for bobbin winding and reducing plant costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional two-step process with separate plants is used, then each step can be optimized independently, but the process becomes complex and inefficient due to incompatibility in speed and flow rate parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxidation evennessVSAvoidprocess steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the spinning step and carbonization step into a single integrated in-line process. The spinning unit directly feeds the carbonization unit without intermediate bobbin winding, allowing the PAN precursor to undergo cyclisation and carbonisation continuously. This integration eliminates the incompatibility between spinning speed and carbonization processing speed, ensuring even oxidation while simplifying the overall process structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If high-speed spinning is used, then productivity increases, but the tows become uneven and unsuitable for subsequent carbonization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinning speedVSAvoidtow evenness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a tensioning device in the path between the spinning unit and carbonization unit that dynamically adjusts the tension applied to the PAN precursor tow. This allows the system to accommodate variations in spinning speed while maintaining consistent tow evenness, enabling high-speed spinning without sacrificing quality. The tensioning device compensates for speed variations in real-time, ensuring uniform feeding to the carbonization process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If bobbin winding is implemented, then storage and transport are facilitated, but costs increase and space requirements expand

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage and transportVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the intermediate bobbin winding step from the traditional process. The spinning unit feeds the carbonization unit directly in an continuous in-line manner, removing the need for bobbin storage and handling. This extraction of the unnecessary intermediate step reduces production costs, eliminates associated space requirements, and simplifies the overall manufacturing process while maintaining ease of operation through direct continuous processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Manufacturing precision

If modular modules with low output-speed are used, then tow evenness is improved, but production capacity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetow uniformityVSAvoidproduction capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the carbonization process into multiple independent heating zones within the carbonization unit. Each zone can be controlled separately, allowing the system to process multiple tows simultaneously at optimized speeds. This segmentation enables the maintenance of low output-speed for evenness while compensating for reduced individual module capacity through parallel processing of multiple tows, thereby preserving overall production capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures evenness of tows entering the carbonization step, reduces costs and space requirements, enhances production flexibility, and maintains high efficiency even with low-denier tows, while minimizing productivity loss in case of tow breakage.

Implementation Method 1

the cyclisation reaction of the —CN, equal to 18 kcal/mole, a reaction which represents the first processing step of the polyacrylonitrile fibre

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCyclisation reaction:

Implementation Method 2

modified by thermal treatments and pyrolysis, during which first a reorientation of the molecular segments within the individual fibres is caused

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal treatment: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 3

subsequently, at higher temperatures, the removal of oxygen, hydrogen and of most of the nitrogen occurs, so that the final fibre consists to over 90% and up to 99% of carbon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 4

The PAN fibre thus oxidised hence undergoes a subsequent carbonisation process, generally conducted in an inert atmosphere

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS9677196B2Process for manufacturing carbon fibers
Publication Date: 2017.06.13 M A E
  • US9677196B2 patent drawing
  • US9677196B2 patent drawing
  • US9677196B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Process for manufacturing carbon fibers, includes a first spinning step of a fiber of PAN precursor and a second oxidation/carbonization step of the fiber and the plant thereof. The spinning and oxidation/carbonization steps are performed directly in line and continuously, and hence without any stocking buffer area of a PAN precursor between the two steps. The spinning step is performed at low speed, so that the output speed from the spinning step, downstream of the stretching operations, is a speed falling within the range of the suitable processing speeds in the subsequent oxidation/carbonization step. Moreover, the spinning step is performed in a modular way on a plurality of spinning modules aligned in one or more rows, each spinning module having a productivity not above 10% of the overall productivity of the spinning step. In any individual spinning module, the fibers downstream of the spinning area follow zig-zag, rectilinear paths.