Inline Surge Protection Assembly for Extreme EMP Clamping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrical and electronic systems are vulnerable to extreme transient electromagnetic surges from sources like high-altitude nuclear EMP, intentional electromagnetic interference, and natural phenomena, leading to potential damage and disruption without adequate protection measures.

Innovation Solution

Implementing surge protection devices (SPDs) with hybrid designs that include transient voltage suppressors, metal oxide varistors, gas discharge tubes, and other components, along with continuous monitoring and status tracking, to provide instantaneous response and mitigate the effects of electromagnetic pulses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional surge protection devices are used, then basic protection is provided, but they cannot respond instantaneously to extreme transient electromagnetic surges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection effectivenessVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors voltage and current parameters before extreme surges occur, maintaining readiness to activate protection mechanisms immediately when thresholds are exceeded, rather than waiting for the surge to fully develop

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The protection system dynamically adjusts its response based on real-time detection of surge characteristics, switching between different protection modes and components to optimize both response speed and protection effectiveness for varying surge conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If hybrid surge protection assemblies with multiple components are implemented, then protection capability is enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection capabilityVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The surge protection system is divided into distinct functional modules including voltage suppression components, current diversion components, and control circuits, each handling specific aspects of surge protection to manage complexity through functional separation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple protection mechanisms including voltage suppressors, current diverters, and control systems are integrated into a unified hybrid assembly that operates as a coordinated system, combining the advantages of different component types while managing overall complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If continuous monitoring and status tracking are implemented, then protection readiness is maintained, but system complexity and resource usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection readinessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system operates periodically at predetermined intervals rather than continuously, checking voltage and current parameters at scheduled times to maintain protection readiness while minimizing energy consumption during normal operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically monitors its own status and activates protection mechanisms without external intervention, maintaining protection readiness through self-diagnosis and self-activation capabilities that reduce the need for external control resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the resilience and continuous protection of electrical and electronic systems by effectively absorbing and redirecting excessive energy from electromagnetic surges, ensuring minimal disruption and maintaining operational continuity.

Implementation Method 1

The surge protection devices (SPDs) are described as Types by Underwriters' Laboratories (UL) and as Categories by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics engineers (IEEE) depending on their intended installation allocation. The components used for SPDs have different parameters and functional characteristics to provide solutions to the broad range of pluralities of EMPs from natural and technology-based sources

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNonlinear resistance: Electrical Resistance

Implementation Method 2

They comprise limiting, absorbing, switching, and shunting assemblies including transient voltage suppressors (TVSs), metal oxide varistors (MOVs), gas discharge tubes (GDTs), glass GDTs, avalanche diodes (ADs), avalanche transistors (ATs), spark gap protectors (SPG) and thyristor surge suppressors (TSS)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIonization discharge: Ionisation

Implementation Method 3

They comprise limiting, absorbing, switching, and shunting assemblies including transient voltage suppressors (TVSs), metal oxide varistors (MOVs), gas discharge tubes (GDTs), glass GDTs, avalanche diodes (ADs), avalanche transistors (ATs)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAvalanche breakdown: Avalanche Breakdown

Data Source

PatentUS20250343406A1Methods and systems for protection of electric networks and devices from extreme transient electromagnetic surges
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 EMP SHIELD INC
  • US20250343406A1 patent drawing
  • US20250343406A1 patent drawing
  • US20250343406A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are methods and systems for suppressing extreme voltage surges due to transient electromagnetic energy disturbance such as a detonation of a nuclear weapon at high altitude generating an EMP (HEMP) comprising E1, E2, and E3 component pulses. Surge protection assemblies form a surge protection device (SPD) mounted directly on AC and DC power line conductors with embedded overcurrent protection. The inline mounted SPD eliminates connecting wire leads, propagation time delay response, and voltage drops due to wire inductance, providing accurate clamping level responses. The protecting assemblies are selected and coordinated to achieve a predefined response to react at protection threshold voltage levels and with current capacity to mitigate complex components of HEMP. The tertiary protection assembly disconnects an electrical load after a prolonged overvoltage is present associated with a Geomagnetic disturbance and reconnects the electrical load when an overvoltage condition is not present.