Input Profile Records for Authorized Fraud Detection
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional fraud detection techniques struggle to identify authorized fraud, where an authorized user inadvertently performs fraudulent operations due to manipulation by a bad actor, as the user assumes a legitimate request is genuine.
Innovation Solution
A system utilizing input profile records (IPRs) and non-IPR information to detect authorized fraud by analyzing user biometric features and behavioral patterns, employing machine learning models to identify hesitancy or uncertainty in transactions.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If conventional fraud detection techniques are used to identify authorized users, then user identification accuracy is improved, but the ability to detect authorized fraud deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The system segments fraud detection into two distinct pathways: conventional fraud detection for unauthorized users and authorized fraud detection for legitimate users. This is achieved by creating separate detection mechanisms that analyze different feature sets - traditional authentication features versus behavioral biometric features captured through input profile records. The segmentation allows each pathway to be optimized independently, resolving the contradiction between maintaining high user identification accuracy while detecting authorized fraud.
Solution Approach 2:
The system introduces an intermediary layer - the input profile record (IPR) - that captures behavioral biometric data during normal user interactions. This intermediary structure serves as a mediator between the authorized user's legitimate actions and the fraud detection system. By analyzing subtle behavioral patterns in the IPR data, the system can detect authorized fraud without compromising the primary authentication mechanism, thus maintaining user identification accuracy while enabling new fraud detection capabilities.
2Measurement precision
If biometric features are derived from input profile records to detect authorized fraud, then fraud detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements self-service by capturing behavioral biometric data passively during normal user interactions without requiring additional user actions or specialized hardware. The input profile record automatically records keystroke dynamics, typing patterns, and other behavioral features as users naturally interact with the system. This self-service approach enables sophisticated fraud detection while minimizing system complexity, as the data collection infrastructure leverages existing user interfaces and interaction patterns.
Solution Approach 2:
The system changes the parameters being monitored from traditional authentication credentials to behavioral biometric parameters captured in input profile records. By shifting focus to temporal and behavioral characteristics of user interactions - such as keystroke timing, pressure patterns, and typing rhythm - the system achieves high fraud detection accuracy using data already generated during normal operations. This parameter change avoids the need for complex additional sensing infrastructure.
3Reliability
If continuous monitoring of user behavior is implemented, then real-time fraud detection is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary action by continuously capturing and storing input profile record data during normal user interactions, building a comprehensive behavioral baseline before fraud occurs. This ongoing data collection prepares the system for rapid real-time detection by having pre-processed behavioral patterns and established user profiles ready for comparison. When a transaction occurs, the system can quickly analyze against the pre-built profile without requiring extensive real-time processing, thus achieving real-time fraud detection with minimal processing delay.
Data Source
AI summary
Devices, methods, computer-readable media, and systems with authorized fraud detection. In one example, a device may include a memory including an input profile record (IPR) repository and a non-input profile record (non-IPR) information repository that is distinct from the IPR repository, and an electronic processor in communication with the memory. The electronic processor is configured to receive a current IPR associated with a user entering information to transfer electronic funds, detect that the user is performing authorized fraud based on the current IPR, and responsive to detecting that the user is performing authorized fraud based on the current IPR, output a control signal indicating that the user is performing authorized fraud.


