Cybersecurity Inquiry Response Mapping for Risk Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The exchange of cybersecurity questionnaires between entities is time-consuming, cumbersome, and prone to inconsistencies, making it difficult to determine and manage cybersecurity risk levels accurately and efficiently.

Innovation Solution

A cybersecurity assessment server that parses and standardizes questionnaires, uses machine learning to identify conflicts, and auto-populates responses, enabling timely and reliable risk level determination through inquiry response mapping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If questionnaires are exchanged manually between entities via email, then entities can exchange cybersecurity information, but the process becomes time-consuming and cumbersome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequestionnaire exchange timeVSAvoidquestionnaire response process
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a server as an intermediary that receives questionnaires from multiple entities, stores them, and automatically matches responses to inquiries. This mediator eliminates the need for direct manual email exchanges between entities, significantly reducing time loss and operational burden while maintaining information exchange capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies of questionnaires and responses in a centralized database, allowing multiple entities to access and process the same information without manual redistribution. This copying mechanism eliminates repetitive manual operations and reduces the time required for questionnaire exchange across multiple parties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If multiple questionnaires with different formats are received, then comprehensive cybersecurity assessment is possible, but tracking and analyzing becomes difficult and tedious

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecybersecurity risk assessment accuracyVSAvoidquestionnaire management system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The server implements a universal questionnaire management system that can handle multiple questionnaire formats, types, and sources through a single platform. This multi-functional system standardizes the processing of diverse questionnaires, making tracking and analysis manageable while preserving the comprehensive assessment capability provided by multiple formats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms various questionnaire formats into a standardized internal representation, changing the parameter structure from diverse external formats to a unified internal schema. This parameter transformation enables consistent tracking and analysis of all questionnaires regardless of their original format, maintaining assessment accuracy while reducing management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If supporting documents are sent as email attachments, then evidence can be provided, but the process becomes cumbersome and security risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevidence provisionVSAvoiddocument submission process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The server acts as a secure intermediary for document transmission, replacing direct email attachment exchanges. Entities upload supporting documents to the server, which securely stores and manages them, eliminating the need for email attachments while maintaining evidence provision capability and improving security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates secure digital copies of supporting documents in a centralized repository, allowing verification and access without the security risks of email attachments. This copying mechanism maintains the reliability of evidence provision while eliminating the operational burden and security vulnerabilities of attachment-based transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Adaptability or versatility

If feedback is communicated via email or phone, then communication flexibility is maintained, but feedback is not recorded in the responsive document

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication flexibilityVSAvoidfeedback recording
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements an automated feedback mechanism where all communications, including feedback and questions, are automatically recorded and linked to the relevant questionnaire responses in the database. This feedback loop maintains communication flexibility while ensuring all information is preserved and traceable, eliminating the information loss associated with unrecorded email or phone feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250307430A1Inquiry response mapping for determining a cybersecurity risk level of an entity
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 SECURITYSCORECARD INC
  • US20250307430A1 patent drawing
  • US20250307430A1 patent drawing
  • US20250307430A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a method, system, and device for inquiry response mapping for determining a cybersecurity risk level of an entity. To manage and/or evaluate a cybersecurity risk level based on a relationship between a first entity and a second entity, questionnaires (e.g., requests or inquires) are often exchanged between two entities. One or more aspects of the present disclosure provide populating data sets (e.g., questionnaires) indicative of risk level for the first entity or the second entity. One or more other aspects of the present disclosure further provide determining a cybersecurity risk level of an entity by mapping responses to a plurality of inquiry sets directed to the first entity or the second entity.