Inertial Navigation System Delta Position and Attitude Aiding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inertial navigation systems face challenges in maintaining accuracy due to integration drift and error growth, especially in GNSS denied environments where external aiding is limited, and they struggle to handle aggressive motion and featureless environments effectively.

Innovation Solution

The integration of an inertial navigation system with external aiding sensors and imaging sensors like cameras and lidars, which provide delta attitude and position measurements, allows for calibration of inertial sensor errors using a computation device that processes data from these sensors to reduce error growth and improve navigation accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If inertial navigation system operates independently without external aiding, then system complexity is reduced, but navigation accuracy deteriorates due to integration drift and error growth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces external aiding systems (visual odometry, lidar odometry, GNSS) as intermediary components that provide corrective measurements to the inertial navigation system. These external systems act as mediators that supply position and attitude information to calibrate and correct the drift errors in the inertial sensors, thereby improving navigation accuracy without requiring fundamental changes to the core INS architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where external aiding measurements are continuously fed back to the inertial navigation system to correct accumulated errors. The system uses visual odometry, lidar odometry, and GNSS measurements as feedback signals to adjust and recalibrate the inertial sensor readings, creating a closed-loop system that actively compensates for integration drift and maintains long-term navigation accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If external aiding sensors are integrated to improve accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the external aiding system to perform multiple functions simultaneously. The same external sensors and processing pipeline are used for both visual odometry and lidar odometry, and can also integrate GNSS when available. This multi-functional approach allows the system to improve navigation accuracy through diverse measurement sources while avoiding the complexity of separate dedicated systems for each sensing modality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple external aiding approaches (visual odometry, lidar odometry, GNSS) into a unified navigation solution. By merging these different sensing modalities and integrating their measurements with inertial data in a cohesive framework, the system achieves improved accuracy while managing complexity through shared processing infrastructure and coordinated operation of multiple sensors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If traditional inertial navigation is used in GNSS denied environments, then system simplicity is maintained, but reliability deteriorates due to error growth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

In GNSS denied environments, the patent relies on visual odometry and lidar odometry as intermediary systems to provide the corrective measurements that would normally come from GNSS. These external vision-based systems act as mediators that supply position and attitude information to correct inertial drift, maintaining navigation reliability when traditional GNSS aiding is unavailable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms using visual and lidar odometry measurements to continuously correct inertial navigation errors in GNSS denied environments. The system processes external visual and lidar measurements as feedback signals to adjust and recalibrate the inertial sensor readings, creating a closed-loop system that actively compensates for integration drift and maintains long-term navigation accuracy without relying on GNSS

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If visual and lidar sensors are integrated for odometry, then measurement precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to processing complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveodometry precisionVSAvoidprocessing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines visual odometry and lidar odometry processing into a unified framework that shares common computational infrastructure. By merging the processing pipelines and integrating measurements from both modalities through a coordinated algorithmic approach, the system achieves improved odometry precision while managing processing complexity through shared resources and synchronized operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11859979B2Delta position and delta attitude aiding of inertial navigation system
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US11859979B2 patent drawing
  • US11859979B2 patent drawing
  • US11859979B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for the external aiding of inertial navigation systems are described herein. In certain embodiments, a device includes an inertial navigation system. In some embodiments, the inertial navigation system includes one or more inertial sensors and an input interface for receiving measurements. In further embodiments, the measurements include at least one of delta attitude and/or delta position measurements from an external system, and position and attitude information in an arbitrary map frame. In certain embodiments, the inertial navigation system includes a computation device that is configured to calibrate the errors from the one or more inertial sensors using the received measurements.